rss
Br J Ophthalmol 82:1083-1089 doi:10.1136/bjo.82.9.1083
  • Perspective

Glaucoma drainage devices; past, present, and future

Table 4

Cumulative complication rates in the currently used GDDs

Complications Ahmed valve
(n=115)
Coleman 199526 Coleman 199743Coleman 199744
Krupin valve with disc
(n=75)
Krupin Study Group 199445
Fellenbaum 199424
Baerveldt implant
(n=249)
Lloyd 199448
Sidoti 199547
Smith 199351
Siegner 199546
Molteno implant
(n=395)
Mills 199639
Minckler 198842
Lloyd 199252
Heuer 199241
Hypotony/flat anterior chamber 3.5% 27% 16.5% 5%
Choroidal effusion/haemorrhage 14% 33% 23% 7%
Suprachoroidal haemorrhage 3.5% 1.3% 0.8% 0.5%
Hyphaema 0 1.3% 11% 4%
Vitreous haemorrhage 3.5% 1.3% 7% 2%
Uveitis 1.7% 9.3% 3.6% 0.5%
Malignant glaucoma 0.9% 2.7% 2% 0.5%
Motility problem 3.5% 4% 21% 0.3%
Cataract N/A N/A 9.9% 12%
Tube blocked 7.8% 11% 10 6%
Tube retraction 5.2% 2.7% 2.4% 0.8%
Tube/plate extrusion 4.3% N/A 1.2 0.5%
Tube/plate erosion 0 2.7% 2 3%
Corneal touch 2.6% N/A 4% 3%
Corneal decompensation 3.5% 5.3% 11.6% 14%
Retinal detachment 0 0 5% 3.5%
Encepsulated bleb 3.5% 1.3% 1.6% N/A
Phthisis 0 1.3% 2.4% 4%
Others 1.7% Wound leak 1.3% Wound leak 1.6% Wound leak 0.3% Epiretinal membrane
1.3% Endophthalmitis 0.4% Endophthalmitis 0.3% Perforation
1.3% Decompression retinopathy
  • Cataract developed in 11 out of 91 phakic patients. Mean follow up more than 40 months.

  • Cataract developed in 7 out of 69 phakic patients. Mean follow up 14.4 months.

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.