Article Text

PDF

c-myc, p53, and Bcl-2 expression and clinical outcome in uveal melanoma

Abstract

AIMS Overexpression ofc-myc protein has independent prognostic significance in a variety of primary and metastatic cutaneous melanomas which suggests a possible role for this gene in melanomagenesis. We have therefore examined the importance of this oncogene in uveal melanoma and studied the coexpression of two other gene products,Bcl-2 and p53, which might contribute to its effect.

METHODS The percentage of cells positive for nuclear c-mycexpression was estimated by flow cytometric analysis of nuclei extracted from paraffin blocks. The expression ofBcl-2 and p53protein was assessed by immunohistochemistry. A total of 71 tumours were studied and the results compared with survival with a mean follow up period of 6 years.

RESULTS c-mycwas expressed in >50% of the cells by 70% of the tumours, and was independently associated with improved survival in a Cox multiple regression model. Although Bcl-2 was expressed by the majority of the cells in 67% tumours, it was without effect on prognosis. None of the cases studied showed convincing positivity for p53. Analysis of coexpression showed that the best survival was seen inc-myc+/Bcl-2+ tumours and the worst inc-myc−/Bcl-2−tumours.

CONCLUSION The finding of improved rather than reduced survival inc-myc positive tumours is at variance with skin melanoma. There was no evidence to suggest thatc-myc was modulated by upregulation ofBcl-2 or p53inactivation/mutation. Although Bcl-2 is unlikely to have any effect on tumour growth or metastasis, it could contribute to the general lack of susceptibility to apoptosis in these tumours.

  • uveal melanoma
  • c-myc
  • p53
  • Bcl-2

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Although uveal melanoma is the commonest tumour of the eye, it represents less than 1% of cancer registrations and is a good example of a “rare” tumour. However, it accounts for 13% of deaths from melanoma. Death is invariably due to metastatic disease.1Local treatment involves radiotherapy or enucleation if the tumour is large.

Various chromosomal abnormalities have been found in uveal melanoma, notably loss of chromosome 3, which is associated with a poor prognosis.2 There is also loss of chromosome 6p with overrepresentation of chromosome 6q and chromosome 8. In contrast with skin melanoma, few uveal melanomas show karyotypic abnormalities of chromosomes 1 or 9.3-6 Little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of uveal melanoma. However,p53 abnormalities do not appear to be of major importance,7 despite early indications to the contrary8 and variable immunohistochemical results.9 Recent studies10 have implicatedp16 in at least some uveal melanomas, although mutations have not yet been found.11

Overexpression of the c-myc oncogene is known to influence outcome in a number of tumours,12 13including skin melanoma in which FACS analysis of nuclearc-myc correlates with prognosis.14 15 c-myc is expressed in uveal melanoma.16 Multiplication of chromosome 8 is common in uveal melanoma3 5 11 17 and has been associated with poor prognosis.18 In addition, chromosome 8 multiplication has been found to correlate with growth in uveal melanoma.18 c-myc is in the amplified region of this chromosome and there is one report that cytoplasmic c-myc expression is a prognostic factor in uveal melanoma.19 The primary role ofc-myc is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, but it can also act with other genes to precipitate apoptosis via p53 dependent or independent mechanisms.20 Rescue from this apoptotic pathway is often mediated by Bcl-2,21 which has been reported to be upregulated in most if not all uveal melanomas.22 23 Since the effects of each of these proteins have not previously been studied in the same series of tumours, we have examined coexpression ofBcl-2 and p53 in the cohort of primary tumours in which c-mycwas measured.

Since previous work used FACS analysis to measure nuclearc-myc expression, we chose to use the same method here. However, Bcl-2 andp53 were assessed by immunohistochemistry to conserve tissue and allow comparison with similar studies.

Materials and methods

TUMOUR MATERIAL

Archival, paraffin embedded tumour specimens were obtained from the histopathology files of the Department of Pathology, Institute of Ophthalmology from a series of patients treated at Moorfields Eye Hospital from 1979–86. This series has been used for prognostic studies previously and is well documented with a median 6 year follow up.24 All specimens were obtained from previously untreated cases of large melanomas which were considered unsuitable for radiotherapy and were treated by enucleation; they therefore form a high risk group. There was a total of 71 cases with sufficient tumour material for analysis. This series had a median age at presentation of 60 years (range 12–81 years) with 34 female and 37 male patients. The largest tumour diameter (LTD) was 12 mm (histological section) with ciliary body (CB) involvement in 17 cases and extraocular extension (EOE) in seven tumours. The majority of tumours were of mixed (33) or spindle cell (31) type with two epithelioid tumours. Seven tumours were necrotic and not classifiable.

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY

Paraffin sections of 5 μm were cut from the formalin fixed block used for diagnostic histopathology. In all cases, an avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method was used to demonstrate binding of the primary antibodies to p53 (DO7, M7001) andBcl-2 (M887) which were obtained from Dako Ltd, High Wycombe. All incubations were carried out at room temperature. Antigen retrieval was performed by pressure cooking the sections in TRIS-HCl buffer, pH 9.5, for 2 minutes: 5% urea was added to the buffer used for Bcl-2 antigen retrieval. Following washing, non-specific antibody binding was blocked by the addition of 5% dried milk in TRIS buffered saline (TBS), pH 7.6 for 25 minutes. The primary antibody was diluted 1:25 in TBS + 5% milk protein and left on the slide at room temperature for 60 minutes in a humidified covered tray. The slides were washed three times over 15 minutes in TBS and the second antibody, a biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse antibody (E0354, Dako), added at 1 in 300 dilution in TBS and incubated for 45 minutes at room temperature. After washing, the sections were incubated with a tertiary streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase reagent (K0391, Dako). The sections were again washed in TBS and incubated in Vector Red (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough) for 15 minutes, washed, and lightly counterstained with Mayer’s haematoxylin for 25 seconds. Sections were viewed by direct microscopy and the positivity of the melanoma cells assessed qualitatively. Positive and negative (no primary antibody) controls were included with each batch of sections. The slides stained forBcl-2 were graded by a single pathologist (IAC) without reference to previous data as negative (0), weakly positive (+), moderately positive (++), or strongly positive (+++) based on staining intensity rather than the number of cells stained.

FLOW CYTOMETRY

Flow cytometry for c-myc was performed using a modified version of the method originally described by Watsonet al.25 26 Two 35 μm sections were cut from the block used for diagnosis, dewaxed in xylene (2 × 10 minutes), and rehydrated through a series of alcohols. The tumour was separated from the surrounding normal tissue and nuclear extraction performed by incubation with pepsin solution (4 mg/ml in 0.1 M HCl) for 45 minutes at 37°C. The extracted nuclei were filtered through a 35 μm mesh and divided into two samples, one of which acted as a control while the other was used forc-myc staining. The nuclei concentration was adjusted to 106 cells/ml in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and stained for c-myc using a rabbit polyclonal antibody to the human oncoprotein (Cambridge Research Biomedicals Ltd, Cambridge). A pellet of each test sample was incubated in a volume of 100 μl dilution buffer (PBS + 0.5% normal goat serum + 0.5% Tween 20) containing 4 μl of thec-myc antibody (final dilution 1:25) for 1 hour at room temperature. The control sample was incubated with the corresponding rabbit immunoglobulin fraction as negative control and baseline for flow cytometry. After washing in PBS, both samples were incubated with a 1 in 20 in dilution of the secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Sigma, Poole, Dorset) for 45 minutes at room temperature. The samples were washed in PBS and resuspended in 1 ml PBS containing 1 mg/ml ribonuclease A (Sigma), to which 20 μl of propidium iodide was then added. Stained samples were analysed on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and data analysed for 10 000 events from each sample. The percentage of cells expressingc-myc was defined by setting a region on the control sample containing less than 1% of the events. This region was then superimposed on the c-myc stained sample to define the percentage positivity.

DATA ANALYSIS

The percentage of c-myc positive nuclei, p53, andBcl-2 scores were entered into anaccess 2.0 database (Microsoft) for analysis together with the individual clinical data values previously recorded for these patients.24 Query derived subsets of data were imported into spss for Windows and analysed by Kaplan–Meier and log rank methods. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare those factors exhibiting prognostic associations and linear regression used to examine possible correlation between individual factors.

Results

C-MYC POSITIVITY

Flow cytometry measurements of the percentage of positive nuclei for c-myc varied from 1.5–98.5%, the median positivity was 70.2% with greater than 50% positivity being present in 70% cases. There was strong positive correlation betweenc-myc positivity and favourable outcome as shown in Figure 1. This was significant in the log rank test (p <0.01) and was an independent variable predicting death in the Cox proportional hazards regression model (Table 1). There was no correlation of c-myc with LTD (r = 0.096, NS).

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curve for c-myc showing improved survival in the tumours with higher c-myc positivity (n = 71, log rank test, p <0.01). (a) High c-myc, (b) low c-myc.

Table 1

Cox regression model for c-myc in uveal melanoma, taking into account other prognostic factors of known importance. There were 71 cases in total, 10 with missing values, 0 valid cases with non-positive times, and 3 censored cases before the earliest event in a stratum. Thus, 13 cases were dropped and 58 were available for the analysis. Exp(β) is equivalent to relative risk, for which confidence intervals are given. The test statistic (Wald), degrees of freedom (df), and significance (p value) are also shown

BCL-2 SCORE

The staining pattern for Bcl-2 showed some variability between tumour cells within the tumour, but was often uniform within large areas with predominantly cytoplasmic staining. A subjective grading system was therefore used to assess the degree of expression. Typical results are shown in Figure 2 for both positive and negatively stained tumours. There was moderate or strong positivity in 70% cases. Bcl-2 positivity (that is, moderate to strong staining) was not a strong prognostic factor in Kaplan–Meier univariate analysis (Fig 3), nor in multivariate analysis (Table 1). There was no staining of normal iris or choroidal melanocytes elsewhere in the eye.

Figure 2

Representative examples of Bcl-2 staining in choroidal melanomas. Section (A) was graded +++ and section (B) was graded negative (original magnification ×400).

Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier graph for Bcl-2 showing no influence on survival (n = 96, log rank test, NS). (a) High Bcl-2, (b) low Bcl-2.

P53 EXPRESSION

No nuclear p53 positive tumours were identified by immunohistochemistry despite strong staining of a positive control in all batches stained, and only two tumours showed any evidence of cytoplasmic staining. Further assessment was not performed.

COEXPRESSION AND CLINICAL OUTCOME

To determine the joint prognostic significance ofc-myc and Bcl-2, the original data from this study and previous studies,24 27 was entered into a Cox proportional hazards model together with the c-myc data alone and then with Bcl-2 forced into the model (Table1). While Bcl-2 added no significant predictive value to the model, it was interesting to note that those patients with Bcl-2 andc-myc positive tumours accounted for 49% of the cases examined (Table 2). The best survival was seen inc-myc+/Bcl-2+ tumours, followed byc-myc+/Bcl-2−and c-myc−/Bcl-2+ with the worst inc-myc−/Bcl-2−tumours, but these differences are not statistically significant and the groups are small (Fig 4).

Table 2

Comparison of c-myc positivity (>50% cells positive on FACS analysis) and Bcl-2 positivity (moderate/strong immunostaining) in uveal melanoma (n=69)

Figure 4

Kaplan–Meier graph for grouped c-myc and Bcl-2 showing influence on survival (n = 96, log rank test, df=3, NS). (a) c-myc+/Bcl-2+; (b) c-myc+/Bcl-2−; (c) c-myc−/Bcl-2+; (d) c-myc−/Bcl-2−.

Discussion

The finding in this study that high nuclearc-myc positivity was associated with a good prognosis was unexpected, given the recent finding of an adverse relation in skin melanoma.14 15 However, a similar finding of good prognosis associated with high nuclearc-myc levels has been reported in testicular cancer.26 Since c-myc is thought to act as a nuclear transcription factor, high levels of the protein would be expected to correlate with uncontrolled proliferation and faster growth. However, there was no evidence of an association between c-myc and LTD.

The only previous study concerned with c-mycand clinical outcome in uveal melanoma was reported by Mooyet al. 19 In their study immunohistochemistry was used to detectc-myc, Bcl-2, and Ki-67 antigen. The striking feature of their study was the prevalence of cytoplasmic (80%) rather than nuclear (33%) expression ofc-myc. Although expression in these two cellular compartments was correlated, only cytoplasmic accumulation ofc-myc was found to be a significant adverse prognostic factor. This represents a much lower nuclear positivity than we report in this study using flow cytometry and is also in contrast with our finding that overexpression of c-mycwas associated with favourable outcome. This difference could be attributed to the different techniques and antibodies used. It is of interest that the 9E10 monoclonal antibody used in the study by Mooyet al19 predominantly recognised a 40 kDa protein in the uveal melanoma cells rather than the expected 64–67 kDa protein. It is known that this antibody may recognise breakdown products of c-myc, and that other antibodies have similar problems.

However, the reasons underlying the different prognostic significance in nuclear c-myc expression between skin and uveal melanoma are likely to be complex. Possible technical explanations for the paradox could include post-translational modification of the c-myc protein in poor prognosis tumours leading to lower antibody affinity and a false indication of low c-myc within the cells. Since we have studied nuclear c-mycexpression, we cannot exclude the possibility that cytoplasmicc-myc expression was high in some tumours with low nuclear levels reflecting greater cell cycle deregulation. Nevertheless, c-myc is reported to act mainly as a transcriptional activator28 and a mechanism by which cytoplasmic expression might influence prognosis is not apparent.

In the case of uveal melanoma, our study and others19 22 23 show that most tumours express Bcl-2 but presence of the proto-oncogene is without influence on clinical outcome. This is again in contrast with cutaneous melanoma in which Bcl-2expression decreases with tumour progression29 30and has been shown to be an adverse prognostic marker in metastatic melanoma.31 p53 is not overexpressed in our series and appears to be wild type in most uveal melanomas,7 in contrast with early indications.8 Autocrine secretion of survival factors by uveal melanoma cells may assist their apparent slow growth and resistance to apoptosis.32 We have not assessed the influence of other genes in the apoptosis pathway and it is possible that Bcl-xS,Bcl-xL, BAK,BAD, or BAX might have an effect which would influence the possible biological role of the observed high c-myc expression. Activation of c-myc has been shown to increase the susceptibility to apoptosis in cells subjected to stress, such as adverse microenviromental conditions, through ap53 dependent mechanism.20 33 34

Unlike cutaneous melanoma, the prognosis of uveal melanoma depends solely on the development of haematogenous metastasis and the treatment for metastatic disease has, until recently, been completely ineffective.35 The clues to the biological role of highc-myc levels in uveal melanoma may lie in consideration of the different selective pressures and stresses imposed on metastasising cells by the microenviroment in the blood and in the tissues where they subsequently lodge. In this scenario, cells with high nuclear c-myc which were susceptible to apoptosis via an intact p53 pathway would be less capable of metastasis. Thus, tumours with an intactp53 pathway and highc-myc would be expected to have a better prognosis. In cutaneous melanoma, p53mutation is a late event36 37 and may predispose to metastasis. The tumours have a higher mitotic and apoptotic rate than uveal melanoma,32 but their p53mutation may make apoptosis during metastasis less likely. Highc-myc in such cases would result in faster growth and metastasis, resulting in a poor prognosis.

These findings have some implications for treatment, since most cytotoxic drugs are thought to induce apoptosis by mechanisms which would be influenced in many cell types byc-myc, p53, andBcl-2 status.34 38 Uveal melanoma is remarkably chemoresistant,35 but can be made sensitive to alkylating agents ex vivo by the addition of inhibitors of DNA repair.39 It will be of interest to see whether thec-myc status of the tumour influences this response.

In summary, nuclear c-myc expression is associated with a good prognosis in uveal melanoma. There is differential expression of Bcl-2, but no evidence that it has prognostic significance.p53 is not expressed in most or even all tumours. These results contrast with skin melanoma and provide further evidence of the difference in the biology and behaviour of these tumours, despite their common melanocytic derivation.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association.

References

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.