Article Text


Dry eye after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  1. Yoko Ogawaa,
  2. Shinichiro Okamotob,
  3. Masatoshi Wakuib,
  4. Reiko Watanabeb,
  5. Masakazu Yamadaa,
  6. Mami Yoshinoa,
  7. Masafumi Onoa,
  8. Hao-Yung Yanga,
  9. Yukihiko Mashimaa,
  10. Yoshihisa Oguchia,
  11. Yasuo Ikedab,
  12. Kazuo Tsubotac
  1. aDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, bKeio BMT Program, Division of Haematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, cDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan
  1. Kazuo Tsubota, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College, 5-11-13, Sugano, Ichikawa City, Chiba, 272-8513, Japan.


AIMS To determine the incidence, natural course, and severity of dry eye occurring or worsening after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT).

METHODS At a tertiary care hospital, 53 patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous SCT followed by at least 180 days of follow up were studied prospectively. Examination included grading of symptoms of dry eye, evaluation of ocular surface, tear break up time, and Schirmer tests with and without nasal stimulation. Meibomian gland secretion was also examined using a slit lamp while applying steady digital pressure.

RESULTS Of the 53 patients, 44 received allografts. Half of these patients (22) developed dry eye or their pre-existing dry eye worsened after SCT, while none of nine autograft recipients did. Onset of dry eye was 171 (SD 59) days after SCT. Two types of dry eye occurred. One (n=10) was severe with ocular surface findings resembling Sjögren’s syndrome and reduction of reflex tearing soon after onset. A mild type (n=12) had unimpaired reflex tearing. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) was more frequent and severe in patients with dry eye and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD), and overall severity of dry eye was greater in patients with MGD and chronic GVHD.

CONCLUSIONS Dry eye after SCT occurred only in allograft recipients, and was not evident in autograft recipients. The severe form of dry eye had a tendency to develop rapidly. Further study on the prediction and treatment of severe dry eye after SCT is necessary.

  • allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • dry eye
  • meibomian gland dysfunction
  • graft versus host disease

Statistics from

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an established treatment for many patients with life threatening haematological diseases.1 2 SCT has been increasingly used worldwide in the past two decades. Because many recipients of SCT become long term survivors, their quality of life and the possibility of late complications after SCT have become increasingly important.1 3 Dry eye has become recognised as a major symptom of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) with a significant impact on quality of life, although it is not life threatening.1 3-11 While several supportive measures have been developed and clinically applied,3 8 effective treatment and prophylaxis of dry eye has not yet been established.

In this prospective study, we sought to determine the incidence and natural course of dry eye and to identify risk factors for development of dry eye after SCT, with the ultimate goal of better prophylaxis and treatment of this ophthalmic complication.

Patients and methods


This study was part of a prospective survey evaluating the late effects of SCT. All patients underwent standardised clinical and ophthalmological evaluation as described below before SCT and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after transplantation, and on additional occasions as indicated. Between October 1995 and March 1998, 102 patients underwent SCT at Keio University Hospital. Of these patients, 53 (52.0%) who had follow up periods of at least 180 days after SCT were included in this study. Five patients under 12 years old, 28 patients with shorter follow up periods, and 16 patients who died early in their course of transplant were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.


Symptoms of dry eye, including ocular fatigue, dry eye sensation, a foreign body sensation, ocular pain, blurring, photophobia, red eye, discharge, heavy eye feeling, dull sensation, difficulty of eye opening, epiphora, an itchy sensation, a burning sensation, and dry mouth were graded by patients before and after SCT using a standard questionnaire. Each of the 15 symptoms were scored 0–5 according to severity: 0, none; 1, occasional; 2, constant, but mild and putting no restriction on activities of daily living (ADLs); 3, constant and moderate, but no restriction of ADLs; 4, constant and severe with some restriction of ADLs; 5, severe restriction of ADLs.12 The total maximum score was 75 points. Scores were compared before and after SCT.

The condition of the ocular surface was evaluated with a double staining method using 2 μl of a mixed solution including preservative free 1% rose bengal and 1% fluorescein instilled by a micropipette.13 The degree of rose bengal staining was quantified for the temporal and nasal conjunctiva and the cornea, on a scale of 0–3 points. Fluorescein staining was also rated from 0 to 9, but only for the cornea.14 Tear dynamics were assessed by five different methods15 including tear break up time (BUT), the Schirmer test, the cotton thread test, fluorescein clearance, and a Schirmer test with nasal stimulation. Three values for BUT were obtained at the time of double staining. The Schirmer test with nasal stimulation, which is considered to evoke maximal reflex tearing,16 17 was performed by applying a baby cotton swab to the nasal cavity. Meibomian gland secretions were examined using a slit lamp by application of a constant digital pressure.18 The lens and fundus were examined after pupillary dilatation with 1% tropicamide to look for other ophthalmic complications associated with SCT.


Dry eye was diagnosed when patients had any sign of tear film instability (BUT ⩽5 seconds, Schirmer test ⩽5 mm, or cotton thread test ⩽10 mm), and any abnormality of the ocular surface (rose bengal score ⩾3, fluorescein score ⩾1), and/or symptoms of ocular irritation.19 We used the global diagnostic criteria of dry eye proposed by Lemp.20 Dry eye was diagnosed as a disorder of the tear film due to tear deficiency or excessive tear evaporation which caused damage to the interpalpebral ocular surface and was associated with or without symptoms of ocular discomfort.20 Blepharitis associated with infectious disease, blink disorders, disorders of the lid aperture and lid/globe congruity, other ocular surface disorders and contact lens induced tear film disorders were excluded from the diagnosis of dry eye in this study. Patients who had dry eye before SCT were considered to have sustained a dry eye incident positive only when the severity of dry eye worsened following transplantation. Severe dry eye was defined as reduced reflex tearing (Schirmer test with nasal stimulation ⩽10 mm) and ocular surface abnormality (rose bengal score ⩾3 and/or fluorescein score ⩾1).

To assess obstruction of the meibomian gland orifice, digital pressure was applied on the lower tarsus, and expression of meibomian secretion (meibum) was scored as follows: grade 0, clear meibum easily expressed; grade 1, cloudy meibum expressed with varying degrees of pressure; and grade 2, meibum not expressed even with heavy pressure.21


The basic SCT protocol remained unchanged throughout the study period. Briefly, patients with a malignant disease were treated with four different preparative regimens. For recipients of allogeneic bone marrow from an HLA matched sibling, total body irradiation (TBI) and cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) were used, except for the patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia in chronic phase who received busulphan (BU) plus cyclophosphamide (CY). For recipients of allogeneic bone marrow from an HLA matched unrelated donor, TBI and CY were used with or without Ara-C regardless of primary disease. For recipients of autologous peripheral blood stem/progenitor cells, Ara-C, CY, etoposide, and ranimustine were used in most cases, except for patients with myeloma or breast carcinoma who received melphalan or BU plus thiotepa, respectively. For patients with severe aplastic anaemia, total lymphoid irradiation and CY were used. TBI (12 Gy) was applied by a linear accelerator, usually as six fractions over 3 consecutive days at a dose rate of 15 cGy/min. No shielding was used over the eyes. Post-transplant graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was attempted with either cyclosporine (CSP) and methotrexate (MTX) or tacrolimus (FK506) and MTX as part of a phase III prospective randomised study comparing CSP with FK506. CSP or FK506 was discontinued around day 180 post-transplant. Patients with autologous grafts received no GVHD prophylaxis.

Clinicopathological diagnosis of chronic GVHD was based on previously reported criteria.22 Patients with localised skin and/or liver dysfunction were diagnosed with limited chronic GVHD. When patients had localised skin involvement or liver dysfunction plus chronic aggressive hepatitis, eye involvement (results of Schirmer’s test ⩽5 mm), microsalivary glands or mucosal involvement, or involvement of another target organs, we diagnosed extensive chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD was treated with CSP (initial dose, 1 mg/kg/day) in combination with prednisolone.


The t test was used to evaluate differences in the mean age in Table 1, median onset in Table 4, and MGD score in Table 5. Data are expressed as the mean (SD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparison test (Scheffe’s test) was used for statistical comparison between patients with severe dry eye, milder dry eye, and non-dry eye groups. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare GVHD and non-GVHD patients. Fisher’s direct method was used to evaluate differences between dry eye group and non-dry eye group in terms of sex, stem cell source, and previous acute GVHD in Table 1 and the incidence of dry eye and MGD with or without chronic GVHD in Table 5. A probability level of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Table 1

Patient characteristics by graft type and dry eye status

Table 4

Clinical characteristics of two types of dry eye after allogeneic SCT

Table 5

Correlations between dry eye or MGD and chronic GVHD


Fifty three patients had follow up periods of at least 180 days after SCT, and were evaluable for dry eye. Their clinical profiles are analysed in Table 1. Twenty two (nine females and 13 males) out of 44 allogeneic patients (50.0%) developed dry eye or their pre-existing dry eye worsened after SCT. During this prospective follow up, ophthalmic complications in the allogeneic group other than dry eye also were diagnosed after SCT. Those included MGD (47.8%), retinal haemorrhages and exudates (25.0%), acute conjunctivitis (11.4%), radiation keratopathy or Ara-C induced keratitis (9.1%), transient visual disturbance (9.1%), cataract (6.8%), allergic conjunctivitis (6.8%), and iritis (2.3%). Dry eye was the most frequent complication (Table 2). The mean time of dry eye onset was 171 (SD 59) days after SCT. Dry eye developed after SCT only in the allograft recipients, and not in any autograft recipients. Dry eye after SCT was observed more frequently in patients with chronic GVHD in organs other than the eyes (70.4%) than in patients without chronic GVHD (17.7% ; p<0.005). Before transplantation, nine out of 53 patients (17.0%; seven allograft recipients and two autograft recipients) were diagnosed with dry eye (Table 1). Of these nine patients with dry eye before transplantation, four allograft recipients experienced worsening after SCT. The mean ages of allograft recipients who developed dry eye after SCT and recipients who did not were 36.0 (SD 8.0) years and 27.0 (10.7) years, respectively. The mean age of dry eye patients was significantly higher than that of non-dry eye patients (p<0.005). However, there was no significant correlation between the occurrence of dry eye and recipient sex, stem cell sources (siblings vunrelated donors), or previous histology of acute GVHD (Table1).

Table 2

Ophthalmic complications after allogeneic SCT

Dry eye sensation with dry mouth was the most frequent symptom in patients with dry eye after SCT followed by foreign body sensation, ocular fatigue, discharge, and dull sensations. Recurrent conjunctivitis preceded the onset of dry eye in five patients. The results of ocular surface and tear dynamics evaluation in patients who developed dry eye before and after SCT are shown in Table 3. In this table, the worst value is presented for the post-transplant condition.

Table 3

Clinical characteristics of patients who developed dry eye after SCT

Two types of dry eye were observed (Table 3). In one, manifestations were severe, and ocular surface findings resembled those in Sjögren’s syndrome and reflex tearing was markedly reduced. The severe type was observed in 10 cases (six females and four males). Following onset of dry eye, the conjunctival and corneal findings of severe dry eye rapidly worsened despite currently available treatment. In three cases, reflex tearing was diminished within 1 month after the onset of dry eye. In five cases the ocular surface findings preceded the tear dysfunction. The serial changes in the ocular surface and tear dynamics evaluation in 10 severe dry eye patients are shown in Figure1. Good reflex tearing was present before SCT in 19 of 22 cases, but this began to decrease at about 3 months after SCT, and declined to ⩽10 mm at about 6 months after SCT. In contrast, the mean value of Schirmer tests without nasal stimulation declined to ⩽5 mm at about 9 months after SCT. Keratoconjunctivitis occurred or worsened during the period of 3–6 months after SCT (Fig 1). In mild type, the degree of dry eye was mild without reduced reflex tearing. This type was observed in 12 cases (three females and nine males). Their symptoms and ocular surface findings of dry eye were mild and, were controlled by using commercially available artificial tears (Table3).

Figure 1

The serial changes in the ocular surface and tear dynamics evaluation in 10 severe dry eye patients are shown. Good reflex tearing was present before stem cell transplantation (SCT), but this began to decrease at about 3 months after SCT and declined to ⩽10 mm at about 6 months after SCT.

Severe dry eye developed more frequently in patients with chronic GVHD in organs other than the eyes (p<0.001), and median time from onset of severe dry eye was later than mild dry eye (196 (115) days; range 109–510 days v 149 (63) days; range 83–240 days) after SCT, respectively, but the difference was not significant. The diagnosis of severe dry eye did not significantly correlate with recipient sex, stem cell source, or previous history of acute GVHD. Severity of dry eye correlated with the presence of chronic GVHD and MGD (p<0.001; Table 4).

MGD was recognised more frequently in patients with chronic GVHD (63.0%) than in patients without chronic GVHD (23.5%; p<0.05), and MGD score was also higher in patients with chronic GVHD than without chronic GVHD (p<0.005; Table 5).


We found that half of allogeneic SCT patients developed dry eye or their pre-existing dry eye worsened after transplant. This incidence is much higher than those reported in previous prospective5 6 10 and retrospective7 9 11studies. In previous reports, dry eye after SCT was diagnosed as evaporative and/or tear deficient type using classic or simple diagnostic tests. We used the diagnostic criteria of dry eye including both evaporative and tear deficient type,19 20extensively applied various modern diagnostic tests including Schirmer test with nasal stimulation and evaluation of MGD.15 16 18 The difference in both diagnostic criteria and tools may explain the higher incidence of dry eye in this prospective study. Nine patients (17.0%; median age 33 years) had dry eye before SCT in this prospective study. The incidence was similar to that previously reported using the same diagnostic criteria as our study.23

In this study, none of the patients who received autografts developed dry eye or had worsening of existing dry eye; this ocular complication was clearly limited to allograft recipients. The median time from transplantation to diagnosis of dry eye was 171 (59) days. Administration of immunosuppressant drugs for GVHD prophylaxis is usually completed by about 180 days after SCT, and chronic GVHD frequently develops during tapering or shortly after discontinuation of immunosuppression. One case of dry eye was diagnosed 510 days after SCT, soon after cessation of long term systemic immunosuppressive therapy for chronic GVHD in other organs. The median time from SCT to diagnosis of dry eye tended to coincide with the time when chronic GVHD was frequently observed. These facts suggests that an alloimmune process contributes actively to the pathogenesis of dry eye after SCT.

The distinction that we observed between severe and mild dry eye after allogeneic SCT has not been reported previously. The severe form was observed more frequently with chronic GVHD, suggesting that a post-transplant alloimmune reaction plays a significant part in the development of severe dry eye after SCT. Severe dry eye was not associated with corneal ulcer or conjunctival scarring,24 25 possibly because of the early detection of dry eye in this prospective study with close follow up. It remains unclear whether mild dry eye is a disease with a different aetiology or is an early stage of severe dry eye. We need more patients with a longer follow up to definitively answer this question.

Meibomian gland function was severely damaged in patients with severe dry eye and chronic GVHD. Our results also suggested that MGD may allow us to diagnose severe dry eye with GVHD early in the course of the disease. Meibomian glands are specialised sebaceous glands. It is thought that the bulge of hair follicles located below the opening of the sebaceous duct is destroyed by donor T cells in chronic GVHD.26 27 This seems to result in MGD. Jesteret al showed that hyperkeratinisation of the meibomian duct epithelium leading to plugging and dilatation of the duct underlies the development of MGD in a rabbit model.28We also observed that ocular surface changes preceded the deterioration of tear function in five cases of severe dry eye. Keratinisation may be an another possible mechanism for MGD with GVHD, although the pathogenesis remains controversial.

Although chronic GVHD is the most important cause of dry eye after SCT, total body irradiation, ocular toxicity of chemotherapy, infections, and immunosuppressive therapy may also contribute to dry eye after SCT.1 3 5 10 29

Livesey et al reported the development of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in 81.8% of patients with chronic GVHD and 33.3% of patients after autologous SCT.7 They suggested that orbital irradiation even at the dose used for conditioning contributes to development of KCS. Therefore, dry eye following SCT is not uniquely associated with allogeneic SCT and chronic GVHD. However, our observations were quite different. Two of the seven autograft recipients who had dry eye before SCT did not experience worsening after TBI. One of our patients was treated with local radiotherapy to an orbital tumour 1 year before SCT, but this case was found to have normal tear dynamics and ocular surface just before SCT. Dry eye did not occur until after allogeneic SCT in this case. Parsonset al observed that severe dry eye developed during or shortly after TBI treatment in most cases.30 We observed keratopathy shortly after SCT and TBI, but this resolved by 3 months after SCT. Our findings suggest that low dose fractionated TBI has little influence on the late onset dry eye (observed >100 days ) after SCT.

MTX has mucosal toxicity and affects the meibomian glands.31 CSP also is known to affect mucosal membranes, and can induce gingival and conjunctival hyperplasia.10 32 Ara-C may influence the ocular surface resulting in keratoconjunctivitis.33 34 Typically, symptoms are first noticed 4–7 days after commencement of therapy. We observed typical Ara-C induced keratitis in seven cases, but symptoms and signs of keratoconjunctivitis had resolved in all cases by 3 months after SCT. In addition, we used Ara-C even in the autologous and allogeneic patients who did not develop dry eye or MGD after SCT. Also, having patients observed for up to 30 months after SCT and finding normal meibomian gland function without dry eye, we doubt that MTX, CSP, or Ara-C significantly affects meibomian gland function or predisposes to dry eye after SCT.

The Schirmer test has been used as a gold standard for diagnosis of extensive chronic GVHD involving the eye, although its specificity and sensitivity for diagnosis of dry eye has been questioned. When dry eye for extensive chronic GVHD was diagnosed according to the criteria used in this study,19 20 the false positive diagnosis rate for dry eye due to chronic GVHD by Schirmer test without nasal stimulation was 19.4% (six of 31 cases) with false negative representing 36.4% (eight of 22 cases). Reduction of the mean value of the Schirmer tests with nasal stimulation correlates well with chronic GVHD in organs other than the eyes, but no correlation between the mean results of the Schirmer test without nasal stimulation and chronic GVHD was found. We therefore would emphasise the importance of the Schirmer test with nasal stimulation including ocular surface evaluation16 18-20 to better assess the diagnosis of dry eye associated with chronic GVHD. Dry eye is a major complication after SCT and should be recognised and dealt with. Further study for the diagnosis and treatment should be continued, with a focus on reduced reflex tearing and MGD.


We thank Drs S Suzuki, J Shimazaki, and S Shimmura for their useful suggestions. We thank the orthoptists and photographer Mr Seki, Keio University for their assistance.


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.