rss
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:676-679 doi:10.1136/bjo.83.6.676
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia

  1. Douglas K Newmana,
  2. Miranda M Eastb
  1. aDepartment of Ophthalmology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, bCommunity Child Health, Lifespan Healthcare, Ida Darwin, Fulbourn, Cambridge CB1 5EE
  1. D K Newman, Department of Ophthalmology, Clinic 3 (Box 41), Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ.
  • Accepted 18 December 1998

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS Single optotype tests of visual acuity are widely used for preschool vision screening in order to optimise cooperation with testing. These tests may, however, underestimate the visual acuity deficit in amblyopia because they lack visual crowding. This study assessed the resultant negative predictive value (NPV) for amblyopia.

METHODS Cohort study of 936 children in the Cambridge Health District selected by date of birth. The presence of amblyopia among children who had passed preschool vision screening was determined using Snellen line acuity as the reference test. Preschool vision screening was conducted at 3.5 years of age by community orthoptists. The screening assessment comprised Sheridan–Gardiner single optotype test of visual acuity (referral criterion 6/9 or worse in either eye), cover test, ocular movements, 20Δ prism test, and TNO stereotest.

RESULTS The overall NPV of preschool vision screening for amblyopia was 100% (95% CI 99.4% to 100%). Most children with amblyopia were detected by the Sheridan–Gardiner single optotype test of visual acuity, but the other screening tests were necessary to prevent any false negatives. In isolation, the Sheridan–Gardiner single optotype test of visual acuity has a NPV for amblyopia of only 99.6% (95% CI 98.7% to 99.9%).

CONCLUSION Preschool vision screening using a single optotype test of visual acuity does achieve a high NPV for amblyopia, but only under certain conditions. These comprise a low threshold for referral (6/9 or worse in either eye) and the inclusion of a cover test and tests of binocular function in the screening assessment.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.