rss
Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1002-1005 doi:10.1136/bjo.83.9.1002
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Clinical factors influencing the visual prognosis of the fellow eyes of normal tension glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss

  1. Luigi Fontanaa,b,
  2. Rodolfo Armasa,
  3. David F Garway-Heatha,
  4. Catey V Buncec,
  5. Darmalingum Poinoosawmya,
  6. Roger A Hitchingsa
  1. aGlaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, bDepartment of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences, University “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy, cGlaxo Department of Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London
  1. Roger A Hitchings, Glaucoma Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD.
  • Accepted 11 May 1999

Abstract

AIM To investigate the influence of several clinical variables on the development of visual field loss in the “second eye” of patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) presenting with unilateral field loss.

METHODS Patients with NTG and unilateral field loss at presentation were selected from a cohort of 403 consecutive diagnoses of NTG. The state of the visual field “normal” or with a visual field defect was defined using the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) template. Where available, optic disc planimetry was carried out on stereo photographs taken at presentation. Measurements of the topography of each of these optic discs were compared with morphometric values from a group of normal subjects, allowing for differences in age and disc size. For each patient the percentage of the relative neuroretinal rim (NRR) area was calculated. The time taken to develop a visual field defect was related to clinical factors including age, sex, peak and mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP), refraction, relative NRR area, and the AGIS score of the fellow eye at presentation

RESULTS 54 patients were included in the study. The median (range) follow up time was 49.2 (11.1–116.7) months. 14 (26%) patients developed field loss in the eyes with an initially normal field. The estimate of the median time to field loss onset was 95.1 months. Field damage developed more rapidly in women and in patients with greater AGIS score in the contralateral eye at the beginning of follow up ((adjusted hazard ratio, HR (95% confidence interval, CI) 0.20 (0.04; 0.93); 1.19 (1.02; 1.41) respectively)). Little evidence of any association was found between time to onset of field loss and each of age, refraction, and peak or mean diurnal IOP. Planimetric disc analysis was carried out in 33 (61%) patients. Of these 10 (30%) developed field loss in the eyes with initial normal field at a median follow up of 95.1 months. After adjustment for sex and AGIS, relative NRR area was found to be significantly related to the time of onset of field damage, the greater the reduction in relative NRR area, the shorter the time to visual field loss (HR 0.93 (0.89; 0.99)).

CONCLUSIONS NTG patients with unilateral field loss are at high risk of developing field damage in the eyes with an initially normal visual field. In this study, the visual prognosis of the eye with the normal visual field at presentation was found to be influenced by the extent of the reduction in relative NRR area together with the severity of field damage in the contralateral eye at presentation.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.