Article Text

The conundrum of sweet hyperopia
  1. Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
  2. stuartr{at}

    Statistics from

    The diabetic patient presenting with changing refractive error is not uncommon. We are taught to check for diabetes mellitus if a patient presents with rapidly changing refraction and advise them that spectacles should not be prescribed until the refractive state has stabilised.

    A low degree of myopia (in the order of −2D) is more common in metabolically stable adult diabetics1 and is understood to be due to an increase in lens thickness2 and surface curvature.3 4 Although it is well recognised that transient refractive changes are common during periods of hyperglycaemia, or falling blood glucose during intensive glycaemic control, there has been some controversy about the nature of the changes and the underlying causes. It has been considered that myopia develops in hyperglycaemia,5 6 and that following therapy there is an hyperopic shift.7-11 Some investigators have suggested that acute changes may cause either myopia or hyperopia.12 13 Most of these studies have been retrospective and the study by Okamoto et alin this issue of the BJO (p 1098) is helpful in clarifying some of these issues. In monitoring a group of poorly controlled diabetic patients during intensive glycaemic control there was an increase in hyperopia in all patients studied. The degree of hyperopia correlated with the level of hyperglycaemia and the rate of plasma glucose reduction.

    The refractive power of the eye depends on the anterior and posterior corneal curvature, the corneal thickness, the anterior chamber depth, the lens thickness, the anterior and posterior curvature of the lens, the axial length of the eye, and the refractive index of the cornea, aqueous, lens, and vitreous. Okamoto et alreport that there was no evidence of a change in lens or corneal curvature, lens thickness, or axial length of the eye, and conclude that a change in refractive index of the lens is responsible for the refractive changes. That the refractive changes are due to a change in the lens is supported by studies investigating refractive changes in both phakic and aphakic patients.14

    The mechanism of the increased refractive index and why it takes so long to reverse (up to 20 weeks) remains obscure. There is no knowledge of the biochemical changes occurring in the diabetic lens and any hypothesis is based on experimental studies. Current opinion favours the view that osmotic changes lead to changes in lens hydration.15 Transient differences in osmotic pressure may occur across the blood-ocular barrier and the lens capsule. The lens membranes are permeable to glucose but much less so to sugar alcohols such as sorbitol. As hyperglycaemia stimulates sorbitol production in the lens it may be expected that a subacute rise in glucose levels in the aqueous would result in increased production of sorbitol in the lens and overhydration of the lens. On the other hand an acute rise in external glucose levels causes dehydration of the lens in vitro.16 Depending on the changes in osmotic pressure across the lens membrane, owing to either differing glucose concentrations or sugar alcohol levels within the lens, arguments can be made for either swelling or dehydration of the lens. A change in refractive index must also be considered.

    The production of sorbitol via the polyol pathway in the human lens has been questioned in relation to the refractive changes seen in diabetics.15 Reduction of sugar to sugar alcohol requires the presence of the enzyme aldose reductase, the levels of which are very low in the human lens. The enzyme is located in the lens epithelium and to a lesser extent in the superficial fibres.17 Aldose reductase activity to glucose is poor and it has been suggested that sorbitol may be produced in the human lens from fructose.15

    Hyperglycaemia may also affect the permeability of the lens membrane18 and may influence lens metabolism through yet unknown mechanisms.

    The refractive power of the lens is affected by the refractive gradients across the cortex and nucleus and is dependent on the protein (crystallin) gradients across serial layers of lens fibres. The refractive index and protein concentration is lower in the cortex than the nucleus.19 20 Changes in refractive index therefore may partly depend on how excess water is distributed in the lens.

    Although the basic pathophysiology remains puzzling the paper by Okamato et al is helpful in establishing the natural history of the refractive changes and is welcome.

    Does this influence what advice we give our patients? Patients may have significant problems with everyday tasks including driving. They may require frequent changes of spectacle prescription to function normally till stabilisation. With regard to patients considering refractive surgery, diabetes mellitus remains a relative contraindication to excimer laser photoablative surgery.21


    Cover illustration: You have an eagle eye

    Eagles are majestic birds, and their feeding methods often betoken their majesty. The African fish eagle (Haliaeetus vocifer) is an aerial killer and a robust fisher, although it certainly can be a scavenger or even a pirate of other bird's prey. Few species of birds fish on the wing, but H vocifer, and its North American counterpart, the bald eagle (H leucocephalus), are thoroughly equipped to do so. These bifovate birds rely upon their visual abilities to facilitate their spectacular foraging methods. As can be seen in the photographs,H vocifer will follow its prey throughout the approach and, at the instant of strike, the bird will redirect its gaze to keep the fish in stereoscopic visualisation. The head down position, seen in the photographs on the cover, allows the eagle to use both temporal foveae for binocular stereopsis. The second, or more nasal, fovea in each eye is probably used to spot the prospective prey and perhaps keep the prey in alignment during the initial flight approach. The connecting infula (linear strip fovea connecting the nasal and temporal fovea of each eye), allows the eagle to begin stereoscopic tracking at some point during the approach to help assure that the fish will not be lost in the three dimensional peregrinations within its watery home. The infular strip allows for foveal quality vision as the image swings from the nasal fovea to the temporal fovea in each eye. Although it is not clear when the image becomes stereoscopic, ray tracing would suggest that the infula would allow this stereopsis especially in the later stages of approach.  The eyes are large, both absolutely and relatively, with a globular shape approaching our own. Many eagles have a photoreceptor concentration of over one million/mm2 photoreceptors in the fovea, compared with our own 200 000/mm2. The steep walled temporal foveae may even afford additional linear magnification increasing visual acuity further.  Combine this with a clearer visual axis, increased amacrine cell concentration in the retina, and absent vascular system in front of their retinas, and one has a formidable ocular system with an “eye mindedness” quality.  Usually male and female fish eagles will fish and share their catch with each other in and out of breeding season as they live in lifelong pairs. They have rarely been seen drinking despite their close association with water.  An endearing quality of these birds is their spectacular nuptial display. A mated pair will soar over their territory, calling to each other. The male will dive towards the female, and she will turn over in flight and grasp his talons with hers. Once united with wings outstretched and legs straight, they will spin in graceful cartwheels towards earth breaking contact as they approach ground, only to begin a climb to a suitable height to repeat the performance. This display is often done outside the breeding season and perhaps is a method of re-establishing their mutual bond.  As with the bald eagle in North America, the African fish eagle will utilise piracy (especially from the osprey) and scavenging (carrion) for food.H vocifer has been known to prey upon weaker birds, such as flamingoes and young water birds, especially if these prey species are injured or separated from their flocks. None the less, fish make up 90% of its diet. This eagle has been known to take fish weighing up to 2 kg, a tremendous burden to lift out of the water since even the larger female has a maximum weight of approximately 3½ kg.  Although found in large flocks when food is plentiful, fish eagles are frequently seen as a single pair or an individual bird and are concentrated along rivers, lakes, and wooded sea coasts of sub-Saharan Africa. Their regal appearance and dramatic feeding habits make this species an unforgettable emblem of Africa.—Ivan R Schwab, University of California, Davis, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology

    View Abstract

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.