Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 22 March 2016
- Published on: 22 March 2016
- Published on: 22 March 2016Biometric aspects and comparison with published papersShow More
Editor,
In the discussion Bechmann and colleagues mention the results of Ehlers et al[1] and compare them with the results of Whitacre et al[2] without regard for generally accepted principles of interpretation.[3] Some biometrical considerations will be found in the following. In figure 4 in the paper by Ehlers et al the correlation coefficient between the correction value and corneal thickness is 0.768...Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 22 March 2016Tonometry and central corneal thicknessShow More
Editor,
I read the article by Bechmann et al with interest, and I congratulate the authors on their work. In the discussion, they cover the entire subject of tonometry on the basis of the central corneal thickness (CCT). With the increasing number of corneal refractive procedures performed every year, this point will be associated with much uncertainty for diagnosing glaucoma in the near future. Appare...Conflict of Interest:
None declared.