rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:469-472 doi:10.1136/bjo.84.5.469
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Asymmetries of the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in normal eyes

  1. Yasuo Kurimoto,
  2. Kaori Matsuno,
  3. Yumi Kaneko,
  4. Junichi Umihira,
  5. Nagahisa Yoshimura
  1. Shinshu University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan
  1. Yasuo Kurimoto, Department of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan kurina{at}hsp.md.shinshu-u.ac.jp
  • Accepted 13 January 2000

Abstract

AIMS To investigate the variation in the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in detail in normal eyes with a scanning laser polarimeter.

METHODS The retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT) was measured in 94 normal volunteers with a scanning laser polarimeter. The mean RNFLT around a 10 pixel-wide ellipse located concentrically with the disc of 1.5 disc diameters was calculated for 16 sectors each of 22.5 degrees. The symmetry of the RNFLT distribution with respect to the horizontal midline for individual eyes and to the vertical meridian for the two eyes was examined.

RESULTS The RNFLT was thicker on the inferior side than on the superior side for the temporal four pairs of 22.5 degrees sectors, and the differences were significant in two of the four temporal pairs (p<0.007). The RNFLT was thicker in the superior than in the inferior side for the nasal four pairs of the sectors, and the differences were significant in three of the four nasal pairs (p<0.04). The mean RNFLT was significantly thicker in the right eyes than in the left eyes in the four temporal sectors (p<0.02), and significantly thicker in the left eyes than in the right eyes in the inferior two nasal sectors (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS Asymmetries of the RNFLT in normal eyes with respect to the horizontal midline and to the vertical meridian for the two eyes were found. These asymmetries should be considered when retinal nerve fibre layer loss is evaluated during the course of a disease process.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.