rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1232-1234 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.10.1232
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Development of a clinically feasible logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart: performance of the “compact reduced logMAR” visual acuity chart in amblyopic children

  1. D A H Laidlaw1,
  2. A Abbott2,
  3. D A Rosser3
  1. 1Vitreo-Retinal Unit, St Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road London SE1 7EH, and Kent County Ophthalmic and Aural Hospital, Church Street, Maidstone, Kent, UK
  2. 2Kent County Ophthalmic and Aural Hospital, Church Street, Maidstone, Kent, UK
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology and International Eye Health, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Mr D A H Laidlaw, Vitreo-Retinal Unit, St Thomas’s Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road London, SE1 7EH, UK; allaidlaw{at}btinternet.com
  • Accepted 20 January 2003

Abstract

Background/aim: The “compact reduced logMAR” (cRLM) chart is being developed as a logMAR alternative to the Snellen chart. It is closer spaced and has fewer letters per line than conventional logMAR charts. Information regarding the performance of such a chart in amblyopes and children is therefore required. This study aimed to investigate the performance of the cRLM chart in amblyopic children.

Methods: Timed test and retest measurements using two versions of each chart design were obtained on the amblyopic eye of 43 children. Using the methods of Bland and Altman the agreement, test-retest variability (95% confidence limits for agreement, TRV) and test time of the cRLM and the current clinical standard Snellen chart were compared to the gold standard ETDRS logMAR chart.

Results: No systematic bias between chart designs was found. For line assignment scoring the respective TRVs were 0.20 logMAR, 0.20 logMAR, and 0.30 logMAR. Single letter scoring TRVs were cRLM (95% CL 0.17) logMAR, ETDRS (95% CL 0.14) logMAR, and Snellen (95% CL 0.29) logMAR. Median testing times were ETDRS 60 seconds, cRLM 40 seconds, Snellen 30 seconds.

Conclusion: The sensitivity to change of the cRLM equalled or approached that of the gold standard ETDRS and was at least 50% better than that of Snellen. This enhanced sensitivity to change was at the cost of only a 10 second time penalty compared to Snellen. The cRLM chart was approximately half the width of the ETDRS chart. The cRLM chart may represent a clinically acceptable compromise between the desire to obtain logMAR acuities of reasonable and known sensitivity to change, chart size, and testing time.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.