rss
Br J Ophthalmol 87:282-284 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.3.282
  • Scientific correspondence

Blindness: how to assess numbers and causes?

Table 2

Attributed cause of blindness among the bilaterally blind as determined by three different methods of assessment (WCE, EVD, and PVS) in communities mesoendemic for onchocerciasis, Kaduna State, Nigeria

Number (%) of blind individuals attributed to cause
Attributed cause Reported cause at perceived visual status (n=221) Diagnosis (right eye) at examination of visually disabled (n=296) Diagnosis (right eye) at whole community examination (n=213)
*Trachoma was recognised as “lash irritation” or words to that effect.
†The word “filaria” was probably the colloquial term used to describe this entity by 5 individuals. Six of the 11 blind from “onchocerciasis” said they went blind after taking “banocide,” “itching tablet,” or “filaria medicine.”
Cataract 13 (6%) 29 (10%) 14 (6%)
Trachoma 2* (1%) 26 (9%) 20 (9%)
Optic atrophy in absence of other pathology 0 (0%) 12 (4%) 24 (11%)
Onchocerciasis 11† (5%) 157 (53%) 92 (43%)
Glaucoma 0 (0%) 14 (5%) 23 (11%)
Other 195 (88%) 58 (20%) 40 (19%)

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.