rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:307-311 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.3.307
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

CNV subtype in first eyes predicts severity of ARM in fellow eyes

  1. S Abugreen1,
  2. K A Muldrew2,
  3. M R Stevenson2,
  4. R VanLeeuwen3,
  5. P T V M DeJong3,4,
  6. U Chakravarthy1,2
  1. 1Royal Hospitals, Belfast, UK
  2. 2Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  4. 4The Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute, KNAW, and Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to: Usha Chakravarthy, FRCS, Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Queen’s University and Royal Group of Hospitals, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK; u.chakravarthy{at}qub.ac.uk
  • Accepted 17 July 2002

Abstract

Aim: To examine the relation between the type of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) in the first eye and age related maculopathy (ARM) severity in the fellow eye.

Methods: Colour fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms from 67 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of CNV in one eye were scrutinised. CNV was classified as wholly classic, predominantly classic, minimally classic, or occult based on the proportion of classic leakage within the lesion. ARM changes in the fellow eye were assigned a severity stage using the system described by the Rotterdam Eye Study. Logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the association between CNV subtype and ARM stage.

Results: Of subjects with classic or predominantly classic CNV in the first eye 78% exhibited least no or early ARM features in the fellow eye. By contrast, 85% of subjects with minimally classic or occult CNV in the first eye exhibited more advanced ARM features in the fellow eye. Kruskall-Wallis one way ANOVA by ranks showed that this was highly significant (p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that as the proportion of occult CNV increased in the first eye, fellow eyes of subjects in this category were more likely to have been assigned to a higher ARM stage (p = 0.019). The area occupied by the CNV in the first eye also influenced severity of ARM changes in the fellow eye.

Conclusion: The type and extent of CNV in the first affected eye has a distinct relation to ARM severity in the fellow eye. Fellow eyes of subjects with minimally classic or occult CNV in the first affected eye show widespread ARM changes suggestive of retinal pigment epithelial dysfunction. These findings suggest that classic CNV may be focal disease while occult CNV is essentially a more widespread retinal pigment epithelial disorder.

Footnotes

    Responses to this article

    • Comments on data analysis
      • Louis Tong
      Br J Ophthalmol published online September 14, 2009

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Social bookmarking

    Register for free content


    Free sample
     This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.