rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:583-586 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.5.583
  • Original Article

Retention of corneal epithelial cells following Goldmann tonometry: implications for CJD risk

  1. R Lim1,
  2. B Dhillon2,
  3. K M Kurian5,
  4. P A Aspinall3,
  5. K Fernie4 and
  6. J W Ironside5
  1. 1Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford, UK
  2. 2Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
  4. 4Neuropathogenesis Unit, Institute of Animal Health, Edinburgh, UK
  5. 5The National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Surveillance Unit, University of Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Baljean Dhillon, Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh, UK; bal.dhillon{at}eyepavilion.zzn.com
  • Accepted 17 September 2002

Abstract

Aims: To assess the adequacy of current decontamination methods for the Goldmann tonometer in the context of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD).

Methods: Reusable Goldmann tonometer prisms were used to perform applanation tonometry on different groups of patients. Following tonometry, retained materials were collected from the tonometer prism head and examined using cytological methods. The used tonometers were subjected to a series of conditions to evaluate their effect on the residual cell numbers found on the tonometer heads. These included wiping alone and wiping or washing followed by disinfection of the tonometer prism. The effect on cell counts of drying the prism overnight was studied, as well as drying overnight and then wiping and disinfecting. All disinfections were performed with sodium hypochlorite (0.05% w/v).

Results: The cytology specimens of 69 patients were studied. Patients using eye drops regularly desquamated significantly more corneal epithelial cells with Goldmann tonometry than patients not using regular eye drops. The mean number of cells was 156 (range 0–470) for patients using eye drops and 14 (4–57) for patients not using eye drops (p = 0.004). Wiping or washing the tonometer head reduced the cell number significantly but neither method completely eliminated cells. The two methods were not significantly different (p=0.3). Drying left a large number of cells (23–320 cells).

Conclusions: Retained corneal epithelial cells, following the standard decontamination routine of tonometer prisms, may represent potential prion infectivity. Manual cleaning was the most important step in reducing epithelial cell retention.

Notes

    Responses to this article

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.