Article Text

PDF

Predictive DNA testing in ophthalmology
  1. D A Mackey,
  2. E Héon,
  3. A R Webster
  1. Correspondence to: Dr David A Mackey, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia: D.Mackey{at}utas.edu.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

A 28 year old man with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) presents with his 4 year old daughter who is afraid of the dark and is bed wetting. He would like his daughter to have a DNA test to determine whether she has RP. The man was diagnosed with RP at age 7 years after his parents noted nyctalopia and he had a confirmatory electroretinogram (ERG). The man’s father was diagnosed at age 30 years, while the man’s younger sister was diagnosed at age 5 years. The man also has a son age 7 years, who seems to have normal vision. None of the adults with RP had visual fields good enough to hold a driver’s licence. The pedigree is shown in Figure 1.

With many patients aware of the publication of the human gene map, clinicians are frequently asked about DNA testing. Could we organise the DNA test? Which genes could we test? Where could it be done? How much would it cost? How accurate are the results?

With any investigation we should ask “How will it change the management of the child?” Should we suggest using a night light or not? Are there any ethical concerns about doing the DNA test? Isn’t it simpler to organise an ERG?

Figure 1

Pedigree showing affected members (solid symbols) and current age or age of diagnosis (Dx) of retinitis pigmentosa.

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Series editors: Susan Lightman and Peter McCluskey

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.