rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:720-725 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.6.720
  • Original Article
    • Clinical science

Intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary angle closure and primary open angle glaucomas

  1. G Gazzard1,2,3,4,
  2. P J Foster1,2,3,4,
  3. J G Devereux1,3,
  4. F Oen1,
  5. P Chew1,5,
  6. P T Khaw2,3,4,
  7. S Seah1
  1. 1Singapore National Eye Centre, (SNEC), 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Republic of Singapore
  2. 2Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), 5th Level, SNEC, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore 168751, Republic of Singapore
  3. 3Institute of Ophthalmology, 11–43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK
  4. 4Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK
  5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Main Building, Level 3, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore
  1. Correspondence to: Mr Gus Gazzard, Department of Wound Healing, Institute of Ophthalmology, Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK; gus{at}gazzard.demon.co.uk
  • Accepted 6 September 2002

Abstract

Aim: To compare the correlation between visual field loss and the pretreatment intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: In a cross sectional observational study of 74 patients (43 PACG, 31 POAG), pretreatment IOP was measured at presentation, before treatment was initiated. The severity of visual field loss was assessed by AGIS score, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD). Glaucomatous optic neuropathy was assessed from simultaneous stereo disc photographs.

Results: There was a stronger correlation between pretreatment IOP and the extent of visual field loss in PACG subjects than in those with POAG for both MD (PACG: Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.43, p = 0.002; r2 = 0.19), (POAG: r = 0.21, p = 0.13; r2 = 0.04) and AGIS score (PACG: r = 0.41, p = 0.003; r2 = 0.17), (POAG: r = 0.23, p = 0.19; r2 = 0.05 respectively). No such associations were seen for pattern standard deviation (PSD) or corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) in either group (p> 0.29). Both horizontal and vertical cup-disc ratio were well correlated with severity of field loss but not with presenting IOP for either diagnosis.

Conclusions: This is consistent with the hypothesis of a greater IOP dependence for optic nerve damage in PACG than POAG and, conversely, a greater importance of other, less pressure dependent mechanisms in POAG compared to PACG.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.