rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1057 doi:10.1136/bjo.87.9.1057
  • Editorial

Is extreme surgery so extreme?

  1. D Wong
  1. St Paul’s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK; david.wong@medix-uk.com

      The jury is out

      A t first sight, using retinectomy for treating glaucoma seemed extreme, even when most of the eyes treated were legally blind. More than 20 years ago, Robert Machemer described performing retinotomy to relieve traction in two patients with retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).1 At the time retinotomy was considered extreme and surgically the last resort. Several years elapsed before small case series began to appear in literature.2–5 By the time that the Silicone Oil Studies Report 5 was published in 1993, retinotomy was firmly established.6 The surprise was not only that gas and oil were equally effective, but that nearly one third of all patients …

      This Article

      Services

      1. Request permissions

      Responses

      1. Submit a response
      2. No responses published

      Social bookmarking

      Register for free content


      Free sample
      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
      View free sample issue >>

      Free archive
      The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
      Register to access the free archive >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.