rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1252-1255 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.033670
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Keratoconus: an analysis of corneal asymmetry

  1. D M Burns1,2,
  2. F M Johnston1,
  3. D G Frazer2,
  4. C Patterson3,
  5. A J Jackson1,2,4
  1. 1Department of Optometry, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Co Londonderry, UK
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast, Belfast, UK
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
  4. 4Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Dr D M Burns Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK; dm.burnsukgateway.net
  • Accepted 5 March 2004

Abstract

Background: Keratoconus, a non-inflammatory corneal ectasia, is reported to have bilateral involvement in over 90% of patients. The purpose of this study was to quantify the extent of asymmetry of disease at presentation to a regional corneal clinic.

Methods: Eighty three patients diagnosed at presentation, using a combination of videokeratography, slit lamp examination, and refractive findings were retrospectively selected. On this basis, 73 patients were designated as having evidence of keratoconus in both eyes. In order to quantify the degree of asymmetry between fellow eyes in these bilateral patients, intraclass correlation was calculated for best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and for 13 different topographical indices generated using videokeratography. In order to examine the link between each index and visual function, the intrapatient differences in each index were compared to the intrapatient differences in BSCVA using Pearson’s correlation.

Results: BSCVA showed a high degree of asymmetry between fellow eyes with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.006. With the exception of area analysed, all of the topographical indices also showed disparity between paired eyes (r = 0.01 to r = 0.25). Pearson’s analysis found that the intrapatient differences in the standard deviation of the power (SDP), average corneal power (ACP), central corneal power (K), as well as the composite keratoconus prediction index (KPI) inversely correlated with the intrapatient differences in best spectacle corrected acuity (r = −0.76,−0.75,−0.69, and −0.73 respectively).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates, quantitatively, the asymmetry of disease found in patients at the point of initial diagnosis of keratoconus. It also suggests that increases in indices which reflect various aspects of corneal power as well as the composite index KPI correlate with a decrease in BSCVA.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.