rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1274-1279 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.046383
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Frequency doubling technology perimetry in non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy with altitudinal defects

  1. C A Girkin1,
  2. G McGwin, Jr2,
  3. J DeLeon-Ortega1
  1. 1Optic Nerve Imaging Center of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and International Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
  1. Correspondence to: Christopher Girkin MD Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Callahan Eye Foundation Hospital, 700 South 18th Street, Suite 601, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA; cgirkinuabmc.edu
  • Accepted 2 June 2004

Abstract

Aim: To determine if frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT) is more sensitive to optic nerve injury in non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) than standard automated perimetry (SAP).

Methods: Charts from 18 patients (20 eyes) with NAION with altitudinal defects who underwent a complete neuro-ophthalmic examination, SAP, and FDT were reviewed. The extent of damage as determined by SAP, FDT, and clinical estimation of the regional extent of optic disc pallor was compared. 10 subjects (20 eyes) with normal ocular examinations and full appearing optic nerve heads were included as a control group.

Results: FDT demonstrated more extensive visual field defects in the relatively intact hemifield on SAP (proportion of locations at 5% or worse in the total deviation plot was 8.7% (SD 6.2%) for SAP and 38.3% (39.5%) for FDT p<0.0027). 16 of 20 eyes with altitudinal NAION demonstrated diffuse optic disc pallor. 11 of these eyes with diffuse pallor demonstrated significant defects in both hemifields using FDT, while only two eyes demonstrated diffuse damage using SAP. Correspondence between the extent of optic disc pallor and the extent of visual scotoma was higher for FDT (85%) than with SAP (40%).

Conclusion: FDT appears more sensitive to axonal injury reflected by the extent of optic disc pallor in altitudinal NAION than SAP and in some patients reveals visual dysfunction in the hemifield that appeared relatively uninvolved when evaluated using SAP.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.