rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1510-1511 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.049924
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Impact factors on intraocular pressure measurements in healthy subjects

  1. T Theelen*,
  2. C F M Meulendijks*,
  3. D E M Geurts,
  4. A van Leeuwen,
  5. N B M Voet,
  6. A F Deutman
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to: Thomas Theelen, MD Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Philips van Leijdenlaan 15, 6525 EX Nijmegen, Netherlands; t.theelenohk.umcn.nl
  • Accepted 14 June 2004

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate whether intraocular pressure (IOP) calculation by applanation tonometry is determined more essentially by the subject’s neck position or by neck constriction.

Methods: 23 right eyes of 23 healthy subjects (12 male, 11 female) were included. IOP was measured by applanation tonometry with the TonoPen on sitting participants under four different conditions: with open collar upright (A) or with the head in the headrest of a slit lamp (B), with a tight necktie upright (C) or in slit lamp position (D). All measurements with neck constriction were performed 3 minutes after placing the necktie.

Results: Mean IOP was 16.9 (SD 2.3) mm Hg (range 11–21 mm Hg) (A), 18.1 (SD 2.2) mm Hg (range 14–22 mm Hg) (B), 17.9 (SD 2.9) mm Hg (range 12–25 mm Hg) (C) and 18.7 (SD 2.7) mm Hg (range 13–24 mm Hg) (D). Mean IOP increased by 1.3 (SD 2.6) mm Hg (p = 0.028, paired t test, range +0.2 to +2.4 mm Hg) if subjects changed position from A to B. There was no statistically significant difference between measurements with or without neck constriction.

Conclusion: Applanation tonometry may be inaccurate if performed in slit lamp position. In contrast, tight neckties do not significantly affect IOP evaluation in healthy subjects.

Footnotes

  • * The authors wish to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint first authors.

  • The authors have no proprietary or financial interest in this study.

  • Presented in part as a poster at the 198th meeting of the Dutch Opthalmologic Society, Amsterdam, Netherlands, March 2004, and at the congress of the European Glaucoma Society, Florence, Italy, June 2004.

Responses to this article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.