rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1512-1517 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.045484
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Cataract surgery and subtype in a defined, older population: the SEECAT Project

  1. A Lewis,
  2. N Congdon,
  3. B Munoz,
  4. H Bowie,
  5. H Lai,
  6. P Chen,
  7. S K West
  1. The Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
  1. Correspondence to: Dr Nathan Congdon Wilmer 120, 600 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; ncongdonjhmi.edu
  • Accepted 4 May 2004

Abstract

Aim: To describe the distribution of cataract subtypes present before surgery among a defined population of older, bilaterally pseudophakic individuals.

Methods: This was a cohort study of bilaterally pseudophakic individuals participating in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE), and their locally resident siblings. Subjects underwent slit lamp and retroillumination photography and grading using the Wilmer Cataract Grading System. For all individuals determined to be bilaterally pseudophakic, an attempt was made to determine for each eye the type(s) of cataract present before surgery, based on previous SEE photographs (for SEE participants) and/or medical records obtained from the operating ophthalmologist (for both SEE participants and their siblings).

Results: The mean age of 223 participants providing data in this study was 78.7 (SD 5.2) years, 19.3% of subjects were black and 60.1% female. The most common surgically removed cataract subtype in this population was pure nuclear (43.5%), followed by nuclear combined with posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC) (20.6%), and nuclear combined with cortical (13.9%); less common types were pure cortical (4.9%), pure PSC (4.5%), and PSC combined with cortical (2.7%). Factors such as sex and source of lens data (study photograph versus clinical record) did not significantly affect the distribution of lens opacity types, while PSC was significantly (p = 0.01) more common among younger people and nuclear cataract was significantly (p = 0.001) more common among white compared to black people.

Conclusion: Epidemiological studies have suggested that the different subtypes of cataract are associated with different risk factors. As studies begin to identify new prevention strategies for cataract, it would appear likely that different strategies will be efficacious against different types of cataract. In this setting, it will be helpful to know which cataract types are most frequently associated with surgery. Among this older, majority white population, nuclear cataract showed a clear predominance among individuals having undergone surgery in both eyes. This may be contrasted with both clinic and population based studies of younger people, which have generally found PSC cataract to predominate.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Aging (R-01 16294), the National Eye Institute (K-23 EY00388) and Research to Prevent Blindness to Drs Congdon and West.

  • The authors have no financial interest in the material presented here.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.