Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity to air stimuli
- 1Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit, School of Optometry and Vision Science and Vision CRC, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia
- 2CCLR, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Canada
- Correspondence to: Dr Fiona Stapleton Vision CRC, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia; F.Stapletonvisioncrc.org
- Accepted 25 May 2004
Abstract
Aims: To determine the repeatability of ocular surface sensitivity to mechanical stimulation using air stimuli and the effect of contact lens (CL) wear on sensitivity.
Methods:Repeatability: 14 subjects (24–39 years) participated. Mechanical sensitivity to warmed (34°C) and ambient (20°C) air was measured for the central cornea (CC), inferior cornea (IC), and inferior conjunctiva (ICON). Measurements were taken on 12 days; six morning and six afternoon measurements. Differences between sites, time of day, and stimulus temperature were evaluated. CL wear: 10 subjects (22–30 years) participated. Measurements were taken at the same time of day, either following no wear, wear of a CL of oxygen permeability [Dk] of 28×10−9 [cm/s][ml O2/ml mm Hg] or wear of a CL of Dk 140×10−9 [cm/s][ml O2/ml mm Hg]. Differences between sites and wear conditions were evaluated.
Results:Repeatability: Sensitivity varied between sites (p<0.01), time of day (p<0.05), and stimulus temperatures (p<0.01). There were no significant differences between days. Mean thresholds for eye temperature stimuli were; CC 64.4 (SD 28.6) ml/min; IC 84.6 (40.0) ml/min; ICON 120.6 (40.4) ml/min and for ambient temperature stimuli were CC 53.9 (16.0) ml/min, IC 59.0 (20.0) ml/min; ICON 72.6 (43.7) ml/min. CL wear: Sensitivity varied between sites and wear conditions (p<0.05). Conjunctival sensitivity was increased after wear of highly oxygen permeable CLs but unaffected by wear of low oxygen permeable CLs.
Conclusions: The prototype gas aesthesiometer is able to repeatably measure ocular surface sensitivity and measurements are consistent with previously reported techniques.
- CC, central cornea
- CL, contact lens
- IC, inferior cornea
- ICON, inferior conjunctiva
- cornea
- conjunctiva
- aesthesiometry
- innervation
- CC, central cornea
- CL, contact lens
- IC, inferior cornea
- ICON, inferior conjunctiva
- cornea
- conjunctiva
- aesthesiometry
- innervation
Footnotes
-
Grant support: The study was partly supported by the Australian Federal Government through the Cooperative Research Centres Programme and through the Australian Research Council Collaborative Grants Programme and by Allergan Ltd.
-
Proprietary interest: None.







