rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:438 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.027508
  • Letter

Penetrating ocular injuries in previously injured blind eyes: should we consider primary enucleation?

  1. D A Hollander,
  2. B H Jeng,
  3. J M Stewart
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Francis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  1. Correspondence to: Jay M Stewart Doheny Retina Institute, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo Street, Suite 3600, Los Angeles, CA 90030, USA; ne62yahoo.com
  • Accepted 12 June 2003

We read with great interest the paper by Kilmartin et al1 in which the authors noted that most of the newly diagnosed cases of sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) in their prospective study occurred in eyes that had sustained multiple injuries, either via trauma or intraocular surgery, and that enucleation following the onset of SO in these eyes was not related to a better visual outcome in the fellow eye. We have recently encountered two cases of ocular trauma in which, with the aforementioned two points in mind, we found it reasonable to consider and offer primary enucleation in an attempt to decrease the risk of SO.

The first case was a 46 year old man who had suffered a previous penetrating injury to his left eye as a child and now presented with …

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.