rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:766-770 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.028548
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study

  1. J G Crowston,
  2. C R Hopley,
  3. P R Healey,
  4. A Lee,
  5. P Mitchell
  1. Centre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Millennium and Save Sight Institutes, University of Sydney, Australia
  1. Correspondence to: Dr P Mitchell Centre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145; paul_mitchellwmi.usyd.edu.au
  • Accepted 17 November 2003

Abstract

Objective: The 97.5th percentile for vertical cup to disc ratio (VCDR) has been proposed as a useful tool to assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in population studies. Previous reports of VCDR percentiles have either not been adjusted for disc size or have been calculated by regression analysis from small hospital based cohorts. The authors’ aim was to generate VCDR percentiles in a large, population based sample.

Methods: Data were collected from 3654 individuals, aged 49 years or older, living in the Blue Mountains, west of Sydney. Vertical disc diameter and VCDR were determined by planimetry from stereo optic disc photographs. The distribution of VCDR and percentiles (95th, 97.5th, 99th) were calculated.

Results: 6678 eyes were included in the analysis. Median cup to disc ratio, 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentile increased with vertical optic disc diameter in a linear fashion. An increase of 0.2 in median VCDR (0.35 to 0.55) was observed between small (1.1–1.3 mm) and large (1.8–2.0 mm) optic discs. An equivalent increase of 0.2 (0.59 to 0.74) was observed for the 97.5th percentile from small to large discs.

Conclusion: VCDR percentiles for a “normal” population, adjusted for vertical optic disc diameter are presented. One quarter of all discs fell within the small or large disc categories highlighting the importance for estimating optic disc size. These data may assist in the diagnosis of glaucoma in clinical practice as well as providing a normative database. Sole use of VCDR percentile cut offs in defining glaucoma cases in population surveys requires further validation.

Footnotes

  • Supported by the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council, Canberra Australia (Grant No 974159) and the Keeler Scholarship, Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London, UK

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.