rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:929-933 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.029066
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

The Seoul Metropolitan Preschool Vision Screening Programme: results from South Korea

  1. H T Lim1,
  2. Y S Yu2,
  3. S-H Park3,
  4. H Ahn1,
  5. S Kim7,
  6. M Lee7,
  7. J-Y Jeong6,
  8. K H Shin4,7,
  9. B S Koo5,7
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  4. 4Department of Ophthalmology, Gacheon College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea
  5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Sung-Ae General Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  6. 6School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
  7. 7Korean Foundation for the Prevention of Blindness, Seoul, South Korea
  1. Correspondence to: Dr S Kim MPH, Korean Foundation for the Prevention of Blindness, Room 704, Sung-Ji Building, 538 Dohwa-2-Dong, Mapo-Gu, Seoul, 121-743, South Korea; KFPB1102kornet.net
  • Accepted 1 October 1900

Abstract

Aim: To report on a new model of preschool vision screening that was performed in metropolitan Seoul and to investigate the distribution of various ocular disorders in this metropolitan preschool population.

Methods: Vision screening was conducted on 36 973 kindergarten children aged 3–5 years in a stepwise manner. The first step was home screening using a set of five picture cards and a questionnaire. The children who did not pass the first step (VA <0.5 in at least one eye or any abnormal responses on the questionnaire) were retested with regular vision charts at the regional public healthcare centres. After this retest, some children were referred to ophthalmologists. The referral criteria for visual acuity were <0.5 at 3 years and <0.63 at 4 or 5 years in at least one eye.

Results: Of those screened, 7116 (19.2%) children did not pass the home screening tests and 2058 (28.9%) out of the 7116 were referred. The results of the ophthalmological examination in eye clinics were only available for 894 children (43.4%) of those who were referred. The rest of the children did not visit ophthalmologists because they had been checked at an eye clinic, were currently under treatment, or for personal reasons. Refractive errors were found in 608 (1.6%) children. Astigmatism was associated in 78.2% of ametropes. Amblyopia was discovered in 149 (0.4%) children and refractive error was the major aetiology with a predominant rate (82.5%). Manifest strabismus was detected in 52 children. The positive predictive value of vision screening for any ophthalmological disorder was 0.77, and 0.49 for significant disorders requiring treatment.

Conclusions: This preschool vision screening model was highly accessible to the children and their parents, easy to administer, and effective to detect a variety of ocular disorders. However, the participation rate of the referred children in the examinations by ophthalmologists was quite low. The performance and efficiency of this screening programme need to be optimised with further revision.

Footnotes

    Responses to this article

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.