rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:995-997 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.036830
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

A randomised trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft after excision of primary pterygium

  1. A L Young1,
  2. G Y S Leung1,
  3. A K K Wong1,
  4. L L Cheng1,2,
  5. D S C Lam1
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
  2. 2Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Tai Po, NT, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
  1. Correspondence to: Dr A L Young Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong; asmyoungnetvigator.com
  • Accepted 1 January 2004

Abstract

Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) and limbal conjunctival autograft (LCAU) are two known useful adjuvants in the prevention of pterygial recurrence. This study was conducted to compare the outcome of these two treatments.

Methods: Prospective study on consecutive cases of primary pterygium (February 2001 to March 2002) randomised into two adjuvant groups: (1) intraoperative 0.02% MMC for 5 minutes or (2) LCAU. Patients were followed for recurrence (defined as fibrovascular tissue invading the cornea >1.5mm) and complications for a period of one year.

Results: 115 eyes in 114 patients who completed the study were randomised to receive MMC (n = 63) and LCAU (n = 52). There were 10 recurrences (15.9%) in the MMC group and only one recurrence (1.9%) in the LCAU group. There was a statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (p = 0.04). There were a total of three conjunctival cysts, three symblephara, one granuloma, and one dellen. No other visually significant complications were encountered in either group.

Conclusion: Although LCAU resulted in better one year success rates, it is technically more difficult and inapplicable in cases with previous limbal disturbance. Simple excision followed by MMC or LCAU are both safe and acceptable adjuvants for pterygium excision. Choice of adjuvant should be carefully made based on assessment of recurrence risk, local practices, and surgeon’s expertise.

Footnotes

  • Financial support: Supported in part by Action for Vision (AFV) Eye Foundation, Hong Kong

  • Financial and propriety interest: none

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.