rss
Br J Ophthalmol 88:998-1001 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.031948
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Penetrating keratoplasty: indications over a 10 year period

Table 3

 Comparison of indications for penetrating keratoplasty nationally (yearly intervals)* and at the Corneoplastic Unit and Eye Bank (CUEB), 1990–99

Primary disease nationally (%) Primary disease at CUEB, 1990–99 (%)
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Total Total
* National data provided by UK Transplant.
†Includes endothelial failure, rejection, primary failure, and other causes of failure.
Regraft† 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.36 40.9 Regraft†
Keratoconus 19 20 20 23 26 24 27 26 25 25 23.5 15 Keratoconus
Fuchs’ dystrophy 8 8 10 11 10 11 11 13 13 13 10.8 9.3 Fuchs’ dystrophy
Endothelial failure: pseudophakic bullous keratopathy 7 10 9 7 7 7 8 7 7 7.6 7.6 Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
Endothelial failure: aphakic bullous keratopathy 13 7 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 4.2
Endothelial failure: other 6 4 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2.5
Chronic inflammation: viral keratitis 6 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 3.5 5.9 Viral keratitis
Chronic inflammation: other 6 5 4 3 3 3 3 2 1 3.2
Aetiology uncertain 3 4 6 5 5 4 3 3 3 4
Trauma: mechanical 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.3
Other 17 14 10 12 12 37 40 39 42 57 28 17.6 Other
Ocular disease unknown 13 22 29 30 27 7 1 1 1 3 13.4
3.6 Other dystrophies

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.