rss
Br J Ophthalmol 88:1191-1196 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.035949
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive

Table 2

 Summary of UFOV scores tabulated by the fail and pass criteria for the integrated visual field and the EVFT

Binocular EVFT
Fail Pass
EVFT, Esterman visual field test; IVF, integrated visual field.
The figures in bold are the mean UFOV scores (SD). The two mean values in the top row (subjects failing the integrated visual field) are not significantly different (p = 0.321). However, both these mean values are significantly different from the mean value (2.41) of the majority of the patients who were classed as a pass on the integrated visual field and a pass on the binocular EVFT (p<0.01)
IVF Fail 3.39 (0.87) 3.75 (0.89)
n  =  13 n  =  8
Pass 2.41 (1.12)
n  =  0 n  =  44

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.