rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:92-95 doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.038778
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Surgical coverage of exposed hydroxyapatite implant with retroauricular myoperiosteal graft

  1. S L Liao1,
  2. S C S Kao2,
  3. J H S Tseng1,
  4. L L-K Lin1
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Hsin Chu Provincial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  1. Correspondence to: Shu-Lang Liao MD Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan; lang89ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
  • Accepted 28 March 2004

Abstract

Background: With the increasing use of hydroxyapatite orbital implants, the complication of exposure has become apparent to oculoplastic surgeons. Many kinds of patch grafts, such as sclera, dermis, and hard palate mucosa, have been used to cover exposed hydroxyapatite implants with inconsistent results. In this study, the authors use a newly developed technique, autogenous retroauricular myoperiosteal graft, and the results are reported.

Methods: A piece of retroauricular muscle together with its underlying periosteum was carefully harvested. This myoperiosteal graft was patched to the debrided hydroxyapatite exposure area with the periosteal surface facing outward. The margin of periosteal surface was secured with conjunctiva and left uncovered for the surrounding conjunctiva to epithelialise.

Results: Nine eyes with hydroxyapatite exposure more than 3 mm were managed with autogenous retroauricular myoperiosteal grafts. Seven cases were successfully treated with single graft surgery. The other two cases needed an additional graft surgery, and there was no re-exposure noted thereafter. Five patients received a successful insertion of the motility peg. All nine patients have been fitted with prosthesis with reasonable motility. There were no complication noted during more than 1 year of follow up.

Conclusion: The thick composite nature of the myoperiosteal graft provides a durable and vascularised coverage for exposed hydroxyapatite implants. This technique offers an encouraging alternative for the management of exposed hydroxyapatite implants.

Footnotes

  • All authors have no financial interest in the materials described in this paper

  • This paper had been presented in the 21st annual meeting of European Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in Gothenburg, Sweden, 2003.

Responses to this article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.