rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1293-1297 doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.067637
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Effect of dorzolamide and timolol on ocular blood flow in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

  1. G Fuchsjäger-Mayrl1,2,
  2. B Wally1,
  3. G Rainer2,
  4. W Buehl2,
  5. T Aggermann1,
  6. J Kolodjaschna1,
  7. G Weigert1,
  8. E Polska1,
  9. H-G Eichler1,
  10. C Vass2,
  11. L Schmetterer1,3
  1. 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  3. 3Institute of Medical Physics, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  1. Correspondence to: Dr L Schmetterer Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Leopold.Schmetterermeduniwien.ac.at
  • Accepted 1 April 2005

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that perfusion abnormalities of the optic nerve head are involved in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. There is therefore considerable interest in the effects of topical antiglaucoma drugs on ocular blood flow. A study was undertaken to compare the ocular haemodynamic effects of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).

Methods: One hundred and forty patients with POAG or OHT were included in a controlled, randomised, double blind study in two parallel groups; 70 were randomised to receive timolol and 70 to receive dorzolamide for a period of 6 months. Subjects whose intraocular pressure (IOP) did not respond to either of the two drugs were switched to the alternative treatment after 2 weeks. Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry was used to measure blood flow in the temporal neuroretinal rim and the cup of the optic nerve head. Pulsatile choroidal blood flow was assessed using laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation amplitude.

Results: Five patients did not respond to timolol and were changed to the dorzolamide group, and 18 patients changed from dorzolamide treatment to timolol. The effects of both drugs on IOP and ocular perfusion pressure were comparable. Dorzolamide, but not timolol, increased blood flow in the temporal neuroretinal rim (8.5 (1.6)%, p<0.001 versus timolol) and the cup of the optic nerve head (13.5 (2.5)%, p<0.001 versus timolol), and fundus pulsation amplitude (8.9 (1.3)%, p<0.001 versus timolol).

Conclusions: This study indicates augmented blood flow in the optic nerve head and choroid after 6 months of treatment with dorzolamide, but not with timolol. It remains to be established whether this effect can help to reduce visual field loss in patients with glaucoma.

Footnotes

  • Financial support from an unrestricted grant from Merck, Sharpe and Dohme is acknowledged.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. German translation
  5. Italian Translation

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.