You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical science
Scientific reports
Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements
  1. N G Strouthidis1,2,
  2. E T White1,
  3. V M F Owen3,
  4. T A Ho1,
  5. C J Hammond4,
  6. D F Garway-Heath1,2
  1. 1Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
  3. 3School of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
  4. 4West Kent Eye Centre, Princess Royal Hospital, Orpington, Kent, UK
  1. Correspondence to: D F Garway-Heath MD, FRCOphth, Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; david.garway-heathmoorfields.nhs.uk

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the test-retest variability of stereometric parameter measurements made with the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) and Heidelberg retina tomograph-II (HRT-II), and to establish which parameter(s) provided the most repeatable and reliable measurements with both devices. An investigation into the factors affecting the repeatability of the measurements of this parameter(s) was conducted.

Methods: 43 ocular hypertensive and 31 glaucoma subjects were recruited to a test-retest study. One eye from each subject underwent HRT and HRT-II imaging by two observers on each of two occasions within 6 weeks of each other. Lens grading was carried out by LOCS III grading and Scheimpflug camera generated densitogram analysis.

Results: Rim area (RA) and mean cup depth measurements were found to be least variable. Both inter-test reference height difference and image quality had a strong relation (R2>0.5, p<0.0001) with inter-test RA difference and, together, are responsible for 70% of RA measurement variability. Image quality was influenced by lens opacity, cylindrical error, and age. Inter-test RA measurement differences were unrelated to the observer or visit interval.

Conclusions: RA represents an appropriate measure for monitoring glaucomatous progression. Reference height difference and image quality were the factors that most influenced RA measurement variability. Image analysis strategies that address these factors may reduce test-retest variability.

  • CND, central nuclear dip
  • HRT, Heidelberg retina tomograph
  • ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient
  • LOCS III, Lens Opacity Classification System III
  • NC, nuclear colour
  • NO, nuclear opalescence
  • OHT, ocular hypertension
  • ONH, optic nerve head
  • POAG, primary open angle glaucoma
  • RA, rim area
  • VF, visual field
  • Heidelberg retina tomograph
  • glaucoma
  • test-retest variability
  • CND, central nuclear dip
  • HRT, Heidelberg retina tomograph
  • ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient
  • LOCS III, Lens Opacity Classification System III
  • NC, nuclear colour
  • NO, nuclear opalescence
  • OHT, ocular hypertension
  • ONH, optic nerve head
  • POAG, primary open angle glaucoma
  • RA, rim area
  • VF, visual field
  • Heidelberg retina tomograph
  • glaucoma
  • test-retest variability

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.067298

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: NGS was funded by a Friends of Moorfields research fellowship and through an unrestricted grant from Heidelberg Engineering.