rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1462-1467 doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.074682
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Frequency of seeing characteristics of the short wavelength sensitive visual pathway in clinically normal subjects and diabetic patients with focal sensitivity loss

  1. E D Gilmore1,2,
  2. C Hudson1,2,3,
  3. R K Nrusimhadevara2,
  4. P T Harvey2
  1. 1School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, M5T 2S8, Canada
  3. 3University of Ulster, Coleraine, Co Londonderry, Northern Ireland, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Chris Hudson PhD, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada; chudsonscimail.uwaterloo.ca
  • Accepted 23 June 2005

Abstract

Aims: To define the frequency of seeing (FOS) characteristics of the short wavelength (SW) sensitive visual pathway in clinically normal subjects and in diabetic patients with focal SW sensitivity loss.

Methods: For clinically normal subjects, FOS was assessed at two retinal locations (4.24° and 9.90° eccentricity) for both white on white (WW) and SW stimulus parameters. Interexamination variability was quantified for the clinically normal subjects only. For patients with diabetes, FOS was assessed inside an area of focal SW sensitivity loss, and at the same eccentricity in the quadrant diametrically opposite, using SW stimulus parameters only.

Results: For clinically normal subjects, the group mean SW FOS slope was significantly flatter (p<0.0001) than that of WW at both locations. The coefficient of repeatability for SW FOS slope was ±41.55 dB−1 (relative to a group mean sensitivity of 23.98 dB−1) and ±19.98 dB−1 (group mean sensitivity 16.15 dB−1) for 4.24° and 9.90°, respectively. For the patients with diabetes, the group mean SW FOS slope was significantly flatter (p = 0.020), and group mean SW threshold significantly higher (p = 0.007) in the area of focal SW sensitivity loss than in that of the non-focal sensitivity loss.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the clinical utility of SW automated perimetry will be limited by a greater magnitude of measurement variability, as indicated by a flatter FOS slope, compared to conventional automated perimetry.

Footnotes

  • Ethical approval: The study was approved by the research ethics board of the University Health Network, Toronto. Informed consent was obtained form each subject after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.