Table 3
Studies assessing effect of cataract on visual field tests
| Study | Year | Test | Glaucoma | MD* | CPSD, PSD, or CLV* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| *Post-cataract extraction: (↔) no change; (↑) improved; (↓) worsened. | ||||||
| MD, mean deviation; PSD, pattern standard deviation; CPSD, corrected pattern standard deviation; CLV, corrected loss variance. | ||||||
| Lam et al17 | 1991 | Humphrey threshold 30-2 | No | ↑ | ↔ | |
| Yao et al18 | 1993 | Octopus (program G1) | No | ↑ | ↔ (CLV) | |
| Stewart et al8 | 1995 | Humphrey 30-2 | Yes | ↔ | ↔ | |
| Smith et al9 | 1997 | Humphrey threshold 24-2 or 30-2 | Yes | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Chen et al10 | 1998 | Humphrey threshold 24-2 or 30-2 | Yes | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Gillies et al11 | 1998 | Humphrey threshold 24-2 | Yes | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Kim et al14 | 2001 | White-on-white 24-2 (FASTPAC) | No | ↑ | ↔ | |
| Kim et al14 | 2001 | Blue on yellow 24-2 (FASTPAC) | No | ↑ | ↔ | |
| Hayashi et al12 | 2001 | Humphrey threshold 30-2 | Yes | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Kook et al16 | 2004 | FDT C-20 | No | ↑ | ↔ | |
| Kook et al16 | 2004 | SITA-fast 30-2 | No | ↑ | ↔ | |
| Tanna et al15 | 2004 | FDT threshold C-20 | No | ↑ | ↔ | |
| Koucheki et al13 | 2004 | Humphrey threshold 24-2 | Yes | ↑ | ↓ | |
| Our study | 2005 | FDT threshold C-20 | Yes | ↑ | ↓ | |
