rss
Br J Ophthalmol 89:1576-1580 doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.077164
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Aniseikonia associated with epiretinal membranes

Table 3

 Assessment of agreement between repeated measurements of horizontal (A) and vertical (B) threshold aniseikonia

1st reading 2nd reading Difference between readings Coefficient of repeatability
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
N, 10.
Two readings were taken on 10 subjects in the control group (Nos 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 15) with a 2 week interval. Induced aniseikonia with size lenses, magnification (m): −9%, −5%, 0%, 5%, 9%.
(A) Induced horizontal aniseikonia with size lenses
−9% −8.4 (1.10) −7.8 (0.54) 1 (0.53) 1.05
−5% −4.5 (0.47) −4.7 (0.42) 0.3 (0.42) 0.84
0% −0.2 (0.59) −0.05 (0.55) 0.5 (0.53) 1.05
5% 4.0 (0.71) 4.3 (0.63) 0.5 (0.41) 0.82
9% 8.0 (1.07) 8.1 (0.96) 0.6 (0.52) 1.03
Mean (SD) 0.58 (0.519) 1.03 (0.119)
(B) Induced vertical aniseikonia with size lenses
−9% −7.8 (1.14) −7.9 (0.85) 0.7 (0.53) 1.06
−5% −4.6 (0.83) −4.7 (0.42) 0.3 (0.42) 0.88
0% 0.1 (0.62) 0.3 (0.43) 0.45 (0.37) 0.74
5% 4.7 (1.13) 4.5 (1.10) 0.5 (0.41) 0.82
9% 8.1 (0.70) 7.8 (0.48) 0.8 (0.42) 0.84
Mean (SD) 0.57 (0.440) 0.84 (0.119)

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.