rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:291-293 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.052167
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Randomised controlled trial of sub-Tenon’s block versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery: a comparison of patient satisfaction

  1. H Rüschen,
  2. D Celaschi,
  3. C Bunce,
  4. C Carr
  1. Moorfields Eye Hospital, St Ann’s Diagnostic and Treatment Centre, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Heinrich Rüschen Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; anaesthetic.researchmoorfields.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 22 July 2004

Abstract

Background/aim: Sub-Tenon’s block (STB) or topical anaesthesia alone (TOP) are popular techniques employed during cataract surgery. TOP is often preferred by healthcare providers because of financial or staffing reasons, despite existing evidence that pain during surgery is better controlled with STB. Pain is not the only consideration that determines patient preference for the anaesthesia technique. The authors decided to investigate the issue of patient satisfaction using the recently developed Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS).

Method: In a randomised controlled pilot trial, 28 patients were enrolled to receive either STB with 3 ml of 2% lidocaine and hyaluronidase, or TOP with proxymetacaine 0.5% and amethocaine 1% (Tetracaine) eye drops. Postoperatively patients rated their satisfaction with anaesthesia care by filling in the self administered written questionnaire, the ISAS.

Results: One patient in the TOP group dropped out of the study because of intolerable pain. Analysis of the questionnaire results with a two sample Wilcoxon rank sum test showed a significant difference in patient satisfaction (p<0.0085). The median satisfaction score was higher in the STB group 2.77 (interquartile range IQR 2.45 to 3), than in the TOP group 2.04 (IQR 1.54 to 2.5).

Conclusion: In the setting of day case cataract surgery, patients report significantly higher satisfaction scores with STB than with TOP alone.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared.

  • The results of this trial were presented at the OAS meeting in Chicago, October 2003.

Responses to this article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.