Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A detailed phenotypic study of “cone dystrophy with supernormal rod ERG”
  1. M Michaelides1,2,
  2. G E Holder2,
  3. A R Webster1,2,
  4. D M Hunt1,
  5. A C Bird1,2,
  6. F W Fitzke1,
  7. J D Mollon3,
  8. A T Moore1,2
  1. 1Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11–43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK
  2. 2Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK
  3. 3Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Professor Anthony T Moore Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11–43 Bath Street, London, EC1V 9EL, UK; tony.mooreucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Aims: To characterise the detailed phenotype of “cone dystrophy with supernormal rod ERG” in a case series of 10 patients.

Methods: 10 affected patients were examined clinically and underwent colour fundus photography, with nine undergoing detailed electrophysiological testing. Five patients were assessed further with fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging, automated photopic and dark adapted perimetry, and dark adaptometry. Detailed colour vision assessment was performed in six subjects. Blood samples were taken from four patients for DNA extraction and mutation screening of NR2E3 was undertaken.

Results: The onset of symptoms was in the first and second decades of life. Subjects presented with reduced central vision and marked photophobia. All individuals were myopic and colour vision testing revealed severely reduced colour discrimination predominantly along the red-green axes; tritan colour vision was relatively well preserved. Nyctalopia is a later feature of the disorder. Funduscopy and AF imaging revealed a range of macular appearances. There was electrophysiological evidence of marked macular dysfunction, reduced and delayed cone responses, and supernormal and delayed rod responses. Photopic and dark adapted perimetry revealed central scotomata with widespread peripheral sensitivity loss. No disease causing sequence variants in NR2E3 were identified.

Conclusions: The largest case series to date has been described of the clinical, psychophysical and electrophysiological characteristics of this unusual cone dystrophy with supernormal rod responses. Electrophysiological data were consistent with a post-phototransduction, but pre-inner nuclear layer, site of dysfunction. While the definitive diagnosis can only be made with electrophysiological testing, several characteristics that may increase suspicion of this diagnosis are presented.

  • AF, autofluorescence
  • BEM, bull’s eye maculopathy
  • cSLO, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope
  • EOG, electro-oculogram
  • ERG, electroretinogram
  • ESCS, enhanced S-cone syndrome
  • PERG, pattern ERG
  • RPE, retinal pigment epithelium
  • VA, visual acuity
  • cone dystrophy
  • supernormal rod electroretinogram
  • AF, autofluorescence
  • BEM, bull’s eye maculopathy
  • cSLO, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope
  • EOG, electro-oculogram
  • ERG, electroretinogram
  • ESCS, enhanced S-cone syndrome
  • PERG, pattern ERG
  • RPE, retinal pigment epithelium
  • VA, visual acuity
  • cone dystrophy
  • supernormal rod electroretinogram

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes