rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:360-363 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.047498
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life

  1. H T V Vu1,
  2. J E Keeffe1,
  3. C A McCarty2,
  4. H R Taylor1
  1. 1Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
  2. 2Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, 1000 North Oak Avenue (ML1), Marshfield WI 54449, USA
  1. Correspondence to: Hien T V Vu Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Vicoria 3002, Australia; hienvunimelb.edu.au
  • Accepted 1 August 2004

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether unilateral vision loss reduced any aspects of quality of life in comparison with normal vision and to compare its impact with that of bilateral vision loss.

Methods: This study used cluster stratified random sample of 3271 urban participants recruited between 1992 and 1994 for the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. All predictors and outcomes were from the 5 year follow up examinations conducted in 1997–9.

Results: There were 2530 participants who attended the follow up survey and had measurement of presenting visual acuity. Both unilateral and bilateral vision loss were significantly associated with increased odds of having problems in visual functions including reading the telephone book, newspaper, watching television, and seeing faces. Non-correctable by refraction unilateral vision loss increased the odds of falling when away from home (OR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.16 to 7.08), getting help with chores (OR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.40 to 6.83), and becoming dependent (getting help with meals and chores) (OR = 7.50, 95% CI 1.97 to 28.6). Non-correctable bilateral visual loss was associated with many activities of daily living except falling.

Conclusions: Non-correctable unilateral vision loss was associated with issues of safety and independent living while non-correctable bilateral vision loss was associated with nursing home placement, emotional wellbeing, use of community services, and activities of daily living. Correctable or treatable vision loss should be detected and attended to.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Ethical approval: The protocol was approved by the Human Research and Ethics Committee of the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
 This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.