rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:398 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.055517
  • Editorial

Is one trial enough?

  1. R Wormald
  1. Correspondence to: Richard P Wormald Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; r.wormalducl.ac.uk

    Is this sufficient evidence to change practice?

    In the March issue of BJO1 a randomised controlled trial was reported in which topical versus sub-Tenon’s local anaesthesia for routine cataract surgery is compared. The trial is well designed and simple, using a validated outcome measure with the outcome observers masked to the intervention. It shows a clear preference for sub-Tenon’s block by patients undergoing routine cataract surgery.

    Does this prove it? Is this sufficient evidence to change practice? In making such a decision, readers will want to critically appraise this evidence. Those who disagree with its findings will try hard to find flaws in the study while those that agree with it will tend to take it as face value and feel vindicated. Both sides will have to consider the probabilities that the results of the study could be erroneous or point to the truth.

    What kinds of errors occur in trials? After bias and confounding have been dealt with (and by …

    Register for free content


    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.