rss
Br J Ophthalmol 89:554-557 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.046813
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

An interinstitutional comparative study and validation of computer aided drusen quantification

Table 1

 Mean deviation for each observer from manual grading (graders JC and RTS from Columbia University, USA and graders VS and BL from Kings College Hospital, UK)

Observer Central subfield Middle subfield
Disagreement in relation to stereo grading (observer manual) 95% CI p Value (two sided) Disagreement in relation to stereo grading (observer manual) 95% CI p Value (two sided)
JC 6.3 −4.7 to 17 0.23 −4.6 −10.7 to 1.5 0.12
RTS 5.2 −6.9 to 17 0.36 −7.5 −12.7 to −2.4 0.01
BL 8.5 −8 to 25 0.27 −4.1 −13.7 to 5.6 0.36
VS 6.8 (−9 to 23) 0.37 −1.3 −10.3 to 7.6 0.73

This Article

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.