rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:694-698 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.055319
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Combined cataract and glaucoma surgery with mitomycin C: phacoemulsification-trabeculectomy compared to phacoemulsification-deep sclerectomy

  1. C L Funnell1,
  2. M Clowes2,
  3. N Anand2
  1. 1West Yorkshire Rotation, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Mr Nitin Anand Department of Ophthalmology, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Lindley, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, UK; nitin.anandlycos.co.uk
  • Accepted 11 October 2004

Abstract

Aims: To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with trabeculectomy (PT) or deep sclerectomy (PDS) with intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) application.

Methods: Non-randomised, consecutive, retrospective comparative study. 97 eyes of 97 patients (59 PDS, 38 PT) undergoing combined surgery with intraoperative MMC (0.1–0.4 mg/ml for 1–3 minutes) were identified for inclusion in the study.

Results: The probability of maintaining intraocular pressure (IOP) below 19 mm Hg and 15 mm Hg, with a 30% drop from preoperative IOP and without additional medication, 1 year after surgery were 77.6% (95% CI: 67 to 90) and 71.5% (60 to 85) for the PDS group and 89.5% (80 to 99) and 89.5 (80 to 99) for the PT group, respectively, and these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05, log rank test). After excluding ocular co-morbidity no differences were observed in the improvement of visual acuity between the two groups. There were no major differences in the complication rates except that delayed bleb leaks were seen in seven eyes (18.4%) of the PT group (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: In this study, no statistically significant difference was found in the IOP and visual outcomes between PDS and PT. A significantly higher frequency of late bleb leaks after PT was observed.

Footnotes

  • The authors have no financial interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this paper.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.