rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:879-884 doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.046169
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis

  1. J E Morgan1,2,
  2. N J L Sheen2,
  3. R V North2,
  4. Y Choong1,
  5. E Ansari1
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK
  2. 2Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3NB, UK
  1. Correspondence to: J E Morgan Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XW, UK; morganje3cardiff.ac.uk
  • Accepted 11 November 2004

Abstract

Aims: To compare monoscopic and stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc using novel software for the digital stereoscopic analysis of optic disc stereopairs.

Methods: Software was developed for the stereoscopic display of digital optic disc images using an interlaced display method. Neuroretinal rim width was determined at 10 degree intervals around the optic disc using a custom (stereoscopic) cursor whose depth was adjusted to that of Elschnig’s rim. Measurements were taken, first viewing the disc monoscopically and at a separate sitting, stereoscopically.

Results: Measurements were made in 35 eyes from 35 patients (1260 estimates for each observer) using three observers. The mean cup to disc ratio (CDR) ranged from 0.57 to 0.66 (SD 0.13–0.14) for monoscopic viewing compared with 0.64 to 0.69 (SD 0.12–0.14) for stereoscopic viewing. Stereoscopic assessments gave higher CDRs in temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior aspects of the optic disc (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Agreement between observers in estimating CDR was high for monoscopic assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 (CI 0.72 to 0.76) increasing to 0.80 (0.78 to 0.82) for stereoscopic assessment.

Conclusion: Digital stereoscopic optic disc assessment provides lower estimates of neuroretinal rim width and higher levels of interobserver agreement compared with monoscopic assessments.

Footnotes

  • Support: Welsh Office for Research and Development (WORD, UK).

  • Presented in part at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, May 2000.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.