rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1242-1244 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.095505
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Glaucoma screening during regular optician visits: can the population at risk of developing glaucoma be reached?

  1. R Stoutenbeek1,
  2. N M Jansonius2
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to: N M Jansonius Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; n.m.jansonius{at}ohk.umcg.nl
  • Accepted 2 June 2006
  • Published Online First 19 July 2006

Abstract

Aim: To determine the percentage of the population at risk of developing glaucoma, which can potentially be reached by conducting glaucoma screening during regular optician visits.

Methods: 1200 inhabitants aged >40 years were randomly selected from Dutch community population databases. A questionnaire was mailed to these inhabitants with questions on their latest optician visit and risk factors for glaucoma. A second questionnaire was sent to their opticians, who were asked about their willingness to conduct an additional glaucoma screening programme in the future.

Results: The questionnaire was returned by 959 of 1200 inhabitants and 37 of 50 opticians. The percentage of inhabitants who visited an optician during a 5-year period was 83% (95% confidence interval (CI) 80% to 85%). This percentage was adjusted for the presence of risk factors for glaucoma to obtain the percentage of the population at risk of developing glaucoma. The percentage of opticians willing to cooperate in a glaucoma screening programme extended beyond a non-contact tonometry measurement alone was 91% (95% CI 77% to 98%).

Conclusion: By conducting glaucoma screening during regular optician visits, a large section of the population at risk of developing glaucoma can be reached.

Footnotes

  • Funding: This research was supported by the University Medical Center Groningen through the Department of Medical Technology Assessment of the University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Published Online First 19 July 2006

Responses to this article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.