rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1505-1509 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.092619
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Nail-patella syndrome and its association with glaucoma: a review of eight families

  1. Z Mimiwati1,2,
  2. D A Mackey1,4,
  3. J E Craig5,
  4. J R MacKinnon3,
  5. J L Rait,
  6. J E Liebelt6,
  7. R Ayala-Lugo7,
  8. D Vollrath8,
  9. J E Richards7
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne
  4. 4University of Tasmania, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
  5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  6. 6South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Adelaide, Australia
  7. 7Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Centre, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
  8. 8Departments of Genetics and Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to: D A Mackey Department of Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, 1/32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia; D.Mackey{at}utas.edu.au
  • Accepted 1 July 2006
  • Published Online First 6 July 2006

Abstract

Background: Nail-patella syndrome (NPS) is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, characterised by dysplasia of the nails, patellae, elbows and iliac horns. Mutations in the LMX1B gene were found in four North American families in whom glaucoma cosegregated with NPS.

Aims: To investigate the association of glaucoma with NPS in Australian families and to determine how common NPS is in Australia.

Methods: One family with NPS and glaucoma was identified from the Glaucoma Inheritance Study in Tasmania. A further 18 index cases of NPS were identified from the genetics database for southeastern Australia. Eight of these pedigrees were available for comprehensive glaucoma examination on available family members. DNA was sequenced for mutations in LMX1B.

Results: In total, 52 living cases of NPS were identified suggesting a minimum prevalence of at least 1 in 100 000. 32 subjects from eight NPS pedigrees (four familial and four sporadic cases) were examined. 14 subjects had NPS alone. 4 subjects had NPS and glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Five pedigrees with NPS had a reported family history of glaucoma, although some of these people with glaucoma did not have NPS. LMX1B mutations were identified in 5 of the 8 index cases—three sporadic and two familial. Two of the six (33%) participants over 40 years of age had developed glaucoma, showing increased risk of glaucoma in NPS.

Conclusion: Patients with NPS should be examined regularly for glaucoma. However, because the families with NPS are ascertained primarily from young probands or probands who are isolated cases, the exact level of risk is unclear.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 6 July 2006

  • Competing interests: None.

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. bjo.2006.092619v1
    2. 90/12/1505 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.