rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:627-639 doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.068668
  • Perspective

The management of retinal vein occlusion: is interventional ophthalmology the way forward?

  1. H Shahid1,
  2. P Hossain2 and
  3. W M Amoaku3
  1. 1Prince Charles Eye Unit, King Edward VII Hospital, Windsor SL4 3DP, UK
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
  3. 3Academic Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Centre, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
  1. Correspondence to: MrW M Amoaku Academic Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Centre, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; wma{at}nottingham.ac.uk
  • Revised 9 December 2005

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are the second commonest sight threatening vascular disorder. Despite its frequency treatments for RVO are unsatisfactory and include several that have not been tested by large, well designed, prospective, randomised controlled trials. There is also the lack of long term follow up in many of the available small uncontrolled studies, and the timings of interventions are haphazard. This review aims to evaluate the current knowledge relating to the pathogenesis, suggested treatments for the different types of RVO, and their complications. Isovolaemic haemodilution is of limited benefit and should be avoided in patients with concurrent cardiovascular, renal, or pulmonary morbidity. Evidence to date does not support any therapeutic benefit from radial optic neurotomy, optic nerve decompression, or arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy on its own. Vitrectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis may offer promise for central RVO. Similarly, vitrectomy combined with arteriovenous sheathotomy intravenous tissue plasminogen activator may offer benefits for branch RVO. RVOs occur at significantly high frequency to allow future prospective randomised controlled studies to be conducted to evaluate the role of different therapeutic modalities singly or in combination.

Notes

  • Proprietary interest: none.

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.