rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:660-661
  • Mailbox

The role of Mohs excision in periocular basal cell carcinoma

  1. E A Barnes1,
  2. A J Dickinson1,
  3. J A A Langtry2,
  4. C M Lawrence2
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
  2. 2Department of Dermatology Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK
  1. Correspondence to: MrEric A Barnes Department of Ophthalmology Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; eric.barnes{at}nuth.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 21 February 2006

We read with interest the paper by Hamada et al,1 which draws a number of conclusions from a 5 year follow up study of 69 periocular basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) treated by conventional surgery and, in particular, suggests that there is no place for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in patients with periocular BCCs. MMS is the serial saucerisation excision with mapped horizontal tissue sections examining 100% of the surgical margins to produce histological evidence of tumour negative margins. Unfortunately, the data included in the paper are incomplete and if such conclusions are to be considered, then further clarification is required.

Risk of BCC recurrence relates directly to the nature of the tumours treated.2 The principal risk factors for recurrence include previous treatment, large tumour size, and …

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJO.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJO. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.