rss
Br J Ophthalmol 90:1019-1023 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.090712
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Visual function in patients with yellow tinted intraocular lenses compared with vision in patients with non-tinted intraocular lenses

  1. K Hayashi1,
  2. H Hayashi2
  1. 1Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan
  1. Correspondence to: Ken Hayashi MD, Hayashi Eye Hospital, 4-7-13 Hakataekimae, Hakata-Ku, Fukuoka 812, Japan; hayashi-ken{at}hayashi.or.jp
  • Accepted 1 April 2006
  • Published Online First 5 April 2006

Abstract

Aim: To compare the visual function in patients with short wavelength blue light blocking yellow tinted intraocular lenses (IOLs) with that in patients with non-tinted IOLs.

Methods: 74 patients scheduled for bilateral cataract surgery underwent implantation of either yellow IOLs (HOYA YA60BB) or non-tinted IOLs (VA60BB) in both eyes. Contrast visual acuity with and without a glare source was measured under photopic (100 cd/m2) and mesopic (slightly higher luminance than typically used—5 cd/m2) conditions at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery using the contrast sensitivity accurate tester. Visual acuity and the incidence of patients who noted cyanopsia were also examined.

Results: No significant differences between the yellow tinted and non-tinted IOL groups were observed in mean visual acuity or in photopic or higher luminance mesopic contrast visual acuity with and without glare source at either 2 weeks or 3 months after surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in contrast visual acuity loss as a result of glare. The incidence of patients who noticed cyanopsia was significantly less in the yellow tinted IOL group than in the non-tinted IOL group at 2 weeks after surgery (p = 0.0234), but no patients reported cyanopsia at 3 months.

Conclusion: Visual function in patients with yellow tinted IOLs is virtually the same as that in patients with non-tinted IOLs.

Footnotes

  • The authors have no proprietary interest in any of the materials described in this article.

Responses to this article