rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:18-21 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.096040
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Robotic ocular surgery

  1. A Tsirbas1,
  2. C Mango1,
  3. E Dutson2
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
  2. 2Centre for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to: Assistant Professor A Tsirbas, Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, 100 Stein Plaza, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; angelotsirbas{at}hotmail.com
  • Accepted 9 June 2006
  • Published Online First 4 October 2006

Abstract

Background: Bimanual, three-dimensional robotic surgery has proved valuable for a variety of surgical procedures.

Aims: To examine the use of a commercially available surgical robot for ocular microsurgery.

Methods: Using a da Vinci surgical robot, ocular microsurgery was performed with repair of a corneal laceration in a porcine model. The experiments were performed on harvested porcine eyes placed in an anatomical position using a foam head on a standard operating room table. A video scope and two, 360°-rotating, 8-mm, wrested-end effector instruments were placed over the eye with three robotic arms. The surgeon performed the actual procedures while positioned at a robotic system console that was located across the operating room suite. Each surgeon placed three 10-0 sutures, and this was documented with still and video photography.

Results: Ocular microsurgery was successfully performed using the da Vinci surgical robot. The robotic system provided excellent visualisation, as well as controlled and delicate placement of the sutures at the corneal level.

Conclusions: Robotic ocular microsurgery is technically feasible in the porcine model and warrants consideration for evaluation in controlled human trials to deploy functioning remote surgical centres in areas without access to state-of-the-art surgical skill and technology.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Published Online First 4 October 2006

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. bjo.2006.096040v1
    2. 91/1/18 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.