rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:51-55 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.097428
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Tacrolimus immunosuppression in high-risk corneal grafts

  1. A Joseph1,
  2. D Raj1,
  3. V Shanmuganathan1,
  4. R J Powell2,
  5. H S Dua1
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Immunology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to: H S Dua Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, B Floor, Eye, ENT Centre, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; harminder.dua{at}nottingham.ac.uk
  • Accepted 28 July 2006
  • Published Online First 6 September 2006

Abstract

Background: Unlike the immune privilege enjoyed by low-risk corneal grafts, high-risk corneal grafts experience rejection rates comparable to liver and kidney transplants. Systemic immunosuppression reduces the risk of rejection in high-risk corneal grafts.

Methods: Systemic tacrolimus, a specific T cell inhibitor, was used at a mean daily dose of 2.5 mg to immunosuppress 43 patients undergoing high-risk corneal transplantation. Immunosuppression was continued for a period of 18–24 months after the high-risk corneal graft.

Results: During a mean follow-up period of 33.7 months, clarity of the graft was maintained in 65% of patients. Eight patients experienced rejection episodes while on tacrolimus, and this led to graft failure in five patients.

Conclusion: Tacrolimus is relatively safe and effective in reducing rejection and prolonging graft survival in patients with high-risk keratoplasty compared with other series where similar immunosuppression was not used.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 6 September 2006

  • Funding: This study was supported by Astellas Pharma, formerly known as Fujisawa Pharmaceuticals, in the form of a stipend paid to AJ during her time as clinical research fellow at the Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. bjo.2006.097428v1
    2. 91/1/51 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.