Article Text

Download PDFPDF
BJO at a glance
  1. Harminder S Dua,
  2. Arun D Singh, Editors-in-Chief

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    RANDOMISED TRIAL COMPARING TOPICAL POVIDONE-IODINE AND CHLORAMPHENICOL FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEONATAL CONJUNCTIVITIS

    2004 newborns from three rural hospitals in a trachoma endemic area of Mexico were randomly assigned to receive either povidone-iodine 2.5% eye drops (PIED) (n  =  1024) or chloramphenicol eye drops (n  =  974). Infectious conjunctivitis was confirmed by laboratory methods, including polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis. During the first two days and after day 16, there was no significant difference in the incidence of bacterial conjunctivitis among groups. From day 3 to day 15 PIED was 6% less effective in preventing infectious conjunctivitis (p  =  0.01). In addition, C trachomatis conjunctivitis was greater in those receiving PIED (RR  =  1.99, log-rank p  =  0.029). Ramirez-Ortiz et al conclude that topical prophylaxis with PIED is insufficient as a prophylaxis against chlamydial conjunctivitis. …

    View Full Text

    Linked Articles