Aim: To assess the efficacy of automated “disease/no disease” grading for diabetic retinopathy within a systematic screening programme.
Methods: Anonymised images were obtained from consecutive patients attending a regional primary care based diabetic retinopathy screening programme. A training set of 1067 images was used to develop automated grading algorithms. The final software was tested using a separate set of 14 406 images from 6722 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of manual and automated systems operating as “disease/no disease” graders (detecting poor quality images and any diabetic retinopathy) were determined relative to a clinical reference standard.
Results: The reference standard classified 8.2% of the patients as having ungradeable images (technical failures) and 62.5% as having no retinopathy. Detection of technical failures or any retinopathy was achieved by manual grading with 86.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval 85.1 to 87.8) and 95.3% specificity (94.6 to 95.9) and by automated grading with 90.5% sensitivity (89.3 to 91.6) and 67.4% specificity (66.0 to 68.8). Manual and automated grading detected 99.1% and 97.9%, respectively, of patients with referable or observable retinopathy/maculopathy. Manual and automated grading detected 95.7% and 99.8%, respectively, of technical failures.
Conclusion: Automated “disease/no disease” grading of diabetic retinopathy could safely reduce the burden of grading in diabetic retinopathy screening programmes.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Competing interests: Implementation in Scotland is being considered. If this occurs it is likely that there will be some remuneration for the University of Aberdeen, NHS Grampian and the Scottish Executive.
Funding: This project was funded by the Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Executive Health Department (grant number CZH/4/76).
Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained from the Grampian Medical Research Ethics Committee for the use of the anonymised images and grading data.