rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:600-601 doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.108043
  • Clinical science
    • Scientific reports

Use of optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography in a screening clinic for wet age-related macular degeneration

  1. James Talks,
  2. Zachariah Koshy,
  3. Konstantinos Chatzinikolas
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  1. Correspondence to: Dr J Talks Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; james.talks{at}newcastle.ac.uk
  • Accepted 17 November 2006
  • Published Online First 6 December 2006

Abstract

Aims: To assess the utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in a nurse-led, fast-track clinic for new age-related macular degeneration (AMD) referrals, and to see how often indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) led to an additional diagnosis to that provided by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA).

Method: Retrospective audit of a consecutive series of 134 new patients referred with suspected wet AMD. When visual acuity was ≥6/60 an OCT was performed. If the OCT was consistent with “wet” AMD, the patient underwent simultaneous FFA/ICGA. The sensitivity and specificity of this clinic was calculated. The number of additional diagnoses made using ICGA was recorded.

Results: 23/134 (17.16%) patients had OCT only and were not subsequently found to have wet AMD. FFA/ICGA was performed in 111 patients, showing wet AMD in 90 (81%) patients. OCT as used in our clinic had a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.65 for detecting wet AMD. ICGA provided additional diagnoses in 19 (14.17%) patients. ICGA detected a specific vascular abnormality in 58% of the occult lesions.

Conclusions: OCT proved to be an effective screening tool for wet AMD in this clinic, with excellent sensitivity and reasonable specificity. ICGA provided an additional diagnosis in a significant number of cases, but did not define a vascular abnormality in all occult cases.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 6 December 2006

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics committee approval not required.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.