rss
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:624-628 doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.087213
  • Clinical science
    • Extended reports

Some dissociating factors in the analysis of structural and functional progressive damage in open-angle glaucoma

  1. C J W Hudson1,
  2. L S Kim2,
  3. S A Hancock3,
  4. I A Cunliffe3,
  5. J M Wild1
  1. 1Cardiff School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. 3Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to: J M Wild Cardiff School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NB, UK;wildjm{at}cardiff.ac.uk
  • Accepted 10 October 2006
  • Published Online First 18 October 2006

Abstract

Aim: To identify the presence, and origin, of any “dissociating factors” inherent to the techniques for evaluating progression that mask the relationship between structural and functional progression in open-angle glaucoma (OAG).

Methods: 23 patients (14 with OAG and 9 with ocular hypertension (OHT)) who had received serial Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT II) and Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) examinations for ≥5 years (mean 78.4 months (SD 9.5), range 60–101 months) were identified. Evidence of progressive disease was retrospectively evaluated in one eye of each patient using the Topographic Change Analysis (TCA) and Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) for the HRT II and HFA, respectively.

Results: Six patients were stable by both techniques; four exhibited both structural and functional progression; seven exhibited structural progression, only, and six showed functional progression, only. Three types of dissociating factors were identified. TCA failed to identify progressive structural damage in the presence of advanced optic nerve head damage. GPA failed to identify progressive functional damage at stimulus locations, with sensitivities exhibiting test-retest variability beyond the maximum stimulus luminance of the perimeter, and where a perimetric learning effect was apparent.

Conclusion: The three dissociating factors accounted for nine of the 13 patients who exhibited a lack of concordance between structural and functional progressive damage.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 18 October 2006

  • Competing interests: JMW has received Honoraria from Carl Zeiss for occasional lectures.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  5. All versions of this article:
    1. bjo.2005.087213v1
    2. 91/5/624 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.